Back to Top

 Skip navigation

Extra information
Methodology Previous Releases
International comparison:
For more information on this release:
E-mail: business_stats@cso.ie Colin Hanley (+353) 21 453 5559 Eamonn Cleary (+353) 21 453 5483
For general information on CSO statistics:
information@cso.ie (+353) 21 453 5000 On-line ISSN

This release has been compiled during the COVID-19 crisis. The results contained in this release reflect some of the economic aspects of the COVID-19 situation.

It is important to note that the results presented in the survey represent responding enterprises only. The CSO acknowledges that non-response may be related to whether businesses are adversely impacted by COVID-19. If this were the case, there is potential for bias in these estimates that weighting procedures would not correct for. As such, the results presented here are unweighted.

For further information see Background Notes. Business Impact of COVID-19

CSO statistical release, , 11am

Business Impact of COVID-19 Survey

2020

Trading status of responding enterprises on 31 May 2020
 % of responding enterprises
SectorTradingCeased trading, (temporarily or permanently)
Industry97.82.2
Construction77.023.0
Wholesale and Retail92.67.4
Accommodation and Food Services37.862.2
All other Services92.77.3
Total89.410.6

Almost nine in ten enterprises were trading on 31 May

Figure 1: Trading status of responding enterprises on 31 May 2020
go to full release

The Business Impact of COVID-19 Survey (BICS) has been created to measure and report quickly on the impact of COVID-19 on business in Ireland. The third wave of the survey was collected in the week commencing 1 June 2020.

A total of 3,000 enterprises were surveyed online for the third wave of the BICS, with 27.9% of sampled enterprises completing the survey. The survey reports:

  • Almost nine in ten (89.4%) of responding enterprises were trading in some capacity on 31 May 2020.
  • More than one in ten (10.6%) had ceased trading, either temporarily or permanently.
  • Less than one in ten (9.6%) of enterprises closed temporarily while 1.0% closed permanently. See Figure 1 and Headline Table.

For further information, see Infographic

 

Please note that not all businesses may be in a position to respond to the Business Impact of COVID-19 Survey. Therefore, the results will only reflect the characteristics of those who responded.
X-axis labelTradingCeased trading temporarily or permanently
Industry97.82.2
Construction7723
Wholesale and Retail92.67.4
Accommodation and Food
Services
37.862.2
All other Services92.77.3

Over three quarters of responding Construction enterprises trading

  • Over three quarters (77.0%) of responding enterprises in the Construction sector were trading in some capacity on 31 May 2020.
  • More than three in every five (62.2%) of enterprises in Accommodation and Food Services had ceased trading, either temporarily or permanently, compared to 7.3% of all other Services enterprises.
  • Over nine in ten (92.6%) of enterprises in the Wholesale and Retail sector were trading in some capacity on 31 May 2020.
  • The Industrial sector had the highest proportion of enterprises trading at 97.8%. See Figure 2 and Headline Table.
For long labels below use
to display on multiple lines
Restarted trading
Industry28.1
Construction58.1
Wholesale and Retail31.9
Services10.5
Total26.3

More than a quarter of responding enterprises restarted trading in May 2020

  • Over a quarter (26.3%) of responding enterprises restarted trading in some capacity in the four weeks 4 May to 31 May 2020.
  • Almost three in five (58.1%) of responding enterprises in the Construction sector restarted trading in this four week period.
  • More than three in ten (31.9%) of enterprises in the Wholesale and Retail sector restarted trading in some capacity in May.
  • In total, 10.5% of Services enterprises restarted trading in May. See Figure 3 and Table 1.
X-axis label4 May-31 May1 Jun-28 Jun
75 to 100% less than normal20.613.5
50 to 74% less than normal1615.2
25 to 49% less than normal21.422.1
10 to 24% less than normal13.517.2
At or close to normal expectation19.225.1
Higher than normal9.36.9

Seven in ten enterprises had lower turnover due to COVID-19 over the four-week period from 4 May to 31 May 2020.

  • Seven in ten (71.5%) responding enterprises had lower than normal turnover for the four-week period from 4 May to 31 May 2020.
  • All respondents in the Accommodation and Food Services sector and 92.8% of those in the Construction sector reported a lower than normal turnover.
  • Nearly one in five (19.2%) enterprises reported turnover at or close to normal expectations, while fewer than one in ten (9.3%) had estimated a higher than normal turnover for the period 4 May to 31 May 2020.
  • A higher proportion of Large enterprises (29.9%) compared to SMEs (17.0%) estimated turnover being normal for the same period.
  • When estimating impact on turnover for the following four weeks (1 June to 28 June), one in four (25.1%) of responding enterprises expected to have similar to normal turnover compared to 6.9% expecting higher than normal turnover.
  • Over two thirds (68.0%) of enterprises estimated lower than normal turnover for the same period. See Figure 4 and Table 2.
For long labels below use
to display on multiple lines
IncreasedNo change or decreasedDon't know
Industry24.470.65
Construction50.931.617.5
Wholesale and Retail44.250.75.1
Services15.179.35.6
Total30.9636.2

Three in ten enterprises had an increase in turnover since the easing of restrictions

  • The turnover of three in ten (30.9%) responding enterprises increased since the easing of restrictions on 18 May 2020.
  • Since 18 May 2020 over half (50.9%) of enterprises in the Construction sector reported an increase in turnover.
  • Nearly four in five (79.3%) enterprises in the Services sector indicated no change or decrease in their turnover since 18 May 2020.
  • Almost a quarter (24.4%) of Industrial enterprises and 44.2% of Wholesale and Retail enterprises reported turnover increases since the easing of restrictions. See Figure 5 and Table 3.
X-axis labelImportsExports
Decrease38.342
Increase4.26.3
Not affected49.344.8
Don't know8.26.9

Imports unaffected for nearly half of respondents

  • Almost half of importing respondents (49.3%) reported that imports were unaffected due to the COVID-19 crisis, compared with 44.8% of exporting enterprises.
  • Exports decreased for 42.0% of enterprises between 4 May and 31 May 2020, while imports decreased for 38.3%. See Figure 6 and Table 4.
For long labels below use
to display on multiple lines
Staff working at
their normal place
of work
Staff working
remotely
Not currently workingOther (deployed elsewhere etc.)
Micro (<10)43.724.424.67.3
Small (10-49)57.121.518.43
Medium (50-249)37.137.921.73.3
Large (250+)38.743.715.81.8
Total46.330.1203.7

Responding enterprises had an average of 30.1% of their workforce working remotely

  • Enterprises had an average of 46.3% of their workforce working at their normal place of work compared to 30.1% working remotely, while 20.0% are not currently working.
  • Small enterprises at 57.1% had the highest average proportion of its workforce at their normal place of work, while medium sized enterprises had the lowest average at 37.1%.
  • Micro-enterprises had the highest average not currently working at 24.6% while large enterprises had the lowest average at 15.8%.
  • Large enterprise had the highest average working remotely at 43.7% while small enterprises had the lowest at 21.5%. See Figure 7 and Table 5.

 

X-axis labelDid not have staff return to workHad staff return to work
Industry8.634.6
Construction5.961.8
Wholesale and Retail 12.532.9
Services15.116.5
Total1230.2

Three in ten of responding enterprises had staff return to work in May

  • Three in ten (30.2%) responding enterprises placed staff on temporary leave during COVID-19 crisis and had staff return to work while 12.0% of enterprises placed staff on temporary leave and did not have staff return to work during the period 4 May to 31 May.
  • More than three in five (61.8%) of enterprises in the Construction sector had staff return to work from temporary leave in May, the highest of any sector.
  • Of the responding enterprises in the Services sector, 15.1% reported that they had staff on temporary leave and did not have staff return to work during the four week-period 4 May to 31 May. See Figure 8 and Table 6.
X-axis labelWorkplace measures
Staff remote working65.7
Rearranging workspace to facilitate social distancing74.2
Staggering shifts to facilitate social distancing37.8
Occupancy limits in the workplace37.8
Mandatory PPE (face covering, gloves, etc.) in the workplace41.3
Maintaining log of meeting to facilitate contact tracing30.5
Increased outdoor working facilities6.1
Other7.9
No measures3.1

Mandatory PPE in the workplace required by two in five enterprises

  • More than two in five (41.3%) of enterprises required mandatory PPE (Personal Protective Equipment), such as gloves and facemasks in the workplace.
  • Nearly three quarters (74.2%) of enterprises rearranged workspace while 37.8% staggered shifts to facilitate social distancing.
  • Over a third (37.8%) introduced occupancy limits in the workplace.
  • Three in ten (30.5%) were maintaining a log of meetings to facilitate contact tracing. See Figure 9 and Table 7.
For long labels below use
to display on multiple lines
Don't knowHigh impactModerate impactLow impactNo impact
Reduced demand2.243.723.313.217.5
Cashflow difficulties2.423.525.619.928.6
Lower productivity4.229.92221.122.8
Cost of implementing COVID-19
measures in the workplace
4.417.637.431.88.9
Restrictions on business operations1.936.927.721.711.7

Reduced demand had a high impact on business for over 40% of responding enterprises

  • More than two in five (43.7%) of responding enterprises reported that a reduction in demand was having a high impact on their business.
  • Cashflow difficulties had no impact on 28.6% of enterprises.
  • Cost of implementing COVID-19 measures had a moderate impact on 37.4% of responding enterprises.
  • Restrictions on business operations had a moderate or high impact on 64.6% of responding enterprises. See Figure 10 and Table 8.

A third of enterprises reported lower than projected personnel costs

  • Over a third (35.2%) of responding enterprises reported lower than projected personnel costs up to 31 May compared to their original projection prior to the COVID-19 crisis while 10.6% reported higher personnel costs.
  • More than a quarter (26.8%) of enterprises had lower than projected non-personnel costs up to 31 May compared to original projections prior to the COVID-19 crisis while 40.5% reported no change in non-personnel costs. See Figures 11a &11b and Table 9.
For long labels below use
to display on multiple lines
Personnel costs
50-100%
lower
12.4
Up to
50%
lower
22.8
No change41.9
Up to
50%
higher
10.1
More than
50% higher
0.5
Don't know12.3
For long labels below use
to display on multiple lines
non-personnel costs
50-100%
lower
6.1
Up to
50%
lower
20.7
No change40.5
Up to
50%
higher
16.6
More than
50% higher
0.7
Don't know15.3
X-axis labelMeasures taken
Deferred or changed loan repayments15.7
Deferred or changed property payments
(including rent, utilities and local authority rates)
22.5
Deferred or changed revenue payments29.5
Other7.7
No measures taken57.7

Three in ten enterprises deferred or changed revenue payments during COVID-19 crisis

  • Almost three in ten (29.5%) of responding enterprises deferred or changed revenue payments in order to manage cashflow during the COVID-19 crisis.
  • Over one fifth (22.5%) deferred or changed property payments while 15.7% deferred or changed loan repayments to alleviate cashflow issues as a result of COVID-19.
  • Nearly three in five (57.7%) enterprises took no measures to manage cashflow. See Figure 12 and Table 10.
For long labels below use
to display on multiple lines
Innovations
Adopted new methods of providing products and services33.8
Adopted new methods of communication53.8
Introduced new products13.1
Repurposed production (e.g. to supply PPE, hand sanitiser, etc.)11
Other3.8

Over half of responding enterprises adopted new methods of communication

  • Over half (53.8%) of responding enterprises have adopted new methods of communication in response to the COVID-19 crisis up to 31 May 2020.
  • Over one third of responding enterprises (33.8%) have adopted new methods of providing products or services as a result of COVID-19.
  • Over one in ten (11.0%) of responding enterprises had repurposed some production to supply products needed during the COVID-19 crisis, e.g. hand sanitiser, PPE, etc. This increased to 20.0% for enterprises in the Manufacturing sector.
  • More than one in ten (13.1%) of enterprises have introduced new products. See Figure 13 and Table 11.
For long labels below use
to display on multiple lines
SMEs (<250)Large (250+)Total
Decreased5.72.95.2
Increased55.15
No change72.379.773.5
Don't know17.112.316.3

No change in ability to access finance according to almost three quarters of responding enterprises

  • Almost three quarters (73.5%) of responding enterprises indicated no change in their ability to access finance between 4 May and 31 May 2020.
  • A decrease in access to finance was indicated by 5.7% of SMEs and 2.9% of large companies who responded to the survey. See Figure 14 and Table 12.

Well over half of responding enterprises expressed confidence in having financial resources to continue operating for longer than six months

  • Almost three in five (58.1%) of responding enterprises expressed confidence in having the financial resources to continue operating for longer than six months. This was 72.5% for Large enterprises and 55.2% for SMEs. 
  • Almost nine in ten (87.9%) of enterprises were confident that they have the financial resources to continue operating for at least another month.
  • However, 4.0% see their business continuing financially for less than a month. Of responding enterprises, 2.3% stated that they were confident that they have the financial resources to continue operating for less than one month, while 1.7% of respondents were not confident they have the financial resources to continue operating. See Figure 15 and Table 13.
For long labels below use
to display on multiple lines
Continue to operate
Up to 1 month2.3
Up to
3 months
17.1
Up to
6 months
12.7
Longer than
6 months
58.1
Not confident1.7
Don't know8.1
For long labels below use
to display on multiple lines
Not availed of Government supportAvailed of Government support
SMEs (<250)39.560.5
Large (250+)52.247.8
Total41.658.4

Nearly three in five enterprises availed of Government supports

  • Nearly three in five (58.4%) of responding enterprises have availed of Government supports during the COVID-19 crisis. This was higher for SMEs (60.5%) compared to Large enterprises (47.8%).
  • Of those responding enterprises who availed of Government supports, more than half (55.4%) had availed of the Revenue Temporary COVID-19 Wage Subsidy Scheme. See Figure 16 and Table 14.
Table 1 Restarted trading in the four weeks 4 May to 31 May 2020 by sector
Sector % of responding enterprises
Industry28.1
Construction58.1
Wholesale and Retail31.9
Services10.5
Total26.3
Table 2 Estimated impact on turnover in the previous (4 May - 31 May) and forthcoming (1 Jun - 28 Jun) four week periods
 % of responding enterprises
Estimated impact on turnover4 May-31 May1 Jun-28 Jun
75-100% less than normal20.613.5
50-74% less than normal16.015.2
25-49% less than normal21.422.1
10-24% less than normal13.517.2
At or close to normal expectation19.225.1
Higher than normal9.36.9
Total100.0100.0
Table 3 Change in turnover following phase one easing of restrictions on 18 May 2020 by sector
 % of responding enterprises
SectorIncreasedNo change or decreasedDon't know
Industry24.470.65.0
Construction50.931.617.5
Wholesale and Retail44.250.75.1
Services15.179.35.6
Total30.963.06.2
Table 4 COVID-19 impact on international trade, 4 May to 31 May 2020
 % of responding enterprises
Impact on international tradeExportsImports
Decrease42.038.3
Increase6.34.2
Not affected44.849.3
Don't know6.98.2
Total100.0100.0
Table 5 Average percentage of workforce by location and size class up to 31 May 2020
    % of responding enterprises
LocationMicroSmallMediumLargeTotal
  (<10) (10-49)(50-249)(250+) 
Staff working at their normal place of work43.757.137.138.746.3
Staff working remotely24.421.537.943.730.1
Not currently working24.618.421.715.820.0
Other (deployed elsewhere etc.)7.33.03.31.83.7
Table 6 Enterprises with staff on temporary leave and who returned to work 4 May to 31 May 2020 by sector
 % of responding enterprises
 IndustryConstructionWholesale and RetailServicesTotal
Enterprises that had staff of temporary leave43.267.745.431.642.2
of which:     
      Had staff return to work34.661.832.916.530.2
      Did not have staff return to work8.65.912.515.112.0
Table 7 Workplace measures implemented due to COVID-19 up to 31 May 2020
 % of responding enterprises
Staff remote working65.7
Rearranging workspace to facilitate social distancing74.2
Staggering shifts to facilitate social distancing37.8
Occupancy limits in the workplace37.8
Mandatory PPE (face covering, gloves, etc.) in the workplace41.3
Maintaining log of meeting to facilitate contact tracing30.5
Increased outdoor working facilities6.1
Other7.9
No measures3.1
Table 8 COVID-19 impact on enterprises by level of impact, 4 May to 17 May 2020
  % of responding enterprises
Impact on enterprisesNo impactLow impactModerate impactHigh impactDon't know
Reduced demand17.513.223.343.72.2
Cashflow difficulties28.619.925.623.52.4
Lower productivity22.821.122.029.94.2
Cost of implementing COVID-19 measures in the workplace8.931.837.417.64.4
Restrictions on business operations11.721.727.736.91.9
Table 9 Estimated change in operating costs up to 31 May 2020
 % of responding enterprises
Estimated change in operating costsPersonnel costsNon-personnel costs
50-100% lower12.46.1
Up to 50% lower22.820.7
No change41.940.5
Up to 50% higher10.116.6
More than 50% higher0.50.7
Don't know12.315.3
Total100.0100.0
Table 10 Measures taken to manage cashflow as a result of the COVID-19 crisis up to 31 May 2020
 % of responding enterprises
Deferred or changed loan repayments15.7
Deferred or changed property payments (including rent, utilities and local authority rates)22.5
Deferred or changed revenue payments29.5
Other7.7
No measures taken57.7
Table 11 Innovations adopted due to COVID-19 up to 31 May 2020
 % of responding enterprises
Adopted new methods of providing products and services33.8
Adopted new methods of communication53.8
Introduced new products13.1
Repurposed production to supply products needed during COVID-19 crisis (e.g. PPE, hand sanitiser or other in-demand products etc.)11.0
Other3.8
Table 12 Changes in access to finance by size class, 4 May to 31 May 2020
 % of responding enterprises
Access to financeSMEsLargeTotal
 (<250)(250+) 
Decreased5.72.95.2
Increased5.05.15.0
No change72.379.773.5
Don't know17.112.316.3
Total100.0100.0100.0
Table 13 Confidence in financial resources to continue operating throughout the COVID-19 crisis, 4 May to 31 May 2020
 % of responding enterprises
Up to 1 month2.3
Up to 3 months17.1
Up to 6 months12.7
Longer than 6 months58.1
Not confident1.7
Don't know8.1
Total100.0
Table 14 Availing of Government supports by size class, 4 May to 31 May 2020
 % of responding enterprises
 SMEsLargeTotal
 (<250)(250+) 
Availed of Government support*60.547.858.4
of which:   
     Revenue Temporary COVID-19 Wage Subsidy Scheme57.147.155.4
     COVID-19 Working Capital Loan Scheme (SBCI)3.50.02.9
     COVID-19 Business Financial Planning Grant (Enterprise Ireland)3.80.03.1
     Other6.71.45.8
Not availed of Government support39.552.241.6
Total100.0100.0100.0
* Note that some enterprises have availed of more than one type of government support.

Background Notes

Introduction

The Business Impact of COVID-19 Survey (BICS) has been created to measure and report quickly on key features of the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on business in Ireland.

The survey is being conducted online and covers a sample of approximately 3,000 enterprises. The first wave of the survey was collected in the week commencing 20 April 2020, with the second wave collected in the week commencing 4 May 2020. The third wave of the survey was issued on 2 June.

Statistical Confidentiality

The survey was collected from enterprises on a voluntary basis under Section 24 of the Statistics Act, 1993.

The information collected in the survey is confidential under the Statistics Act and will only be used by the Central Statistics Office for the compilation of aggregate statistics. The CSO has checked the statistical outputs of the survey to ensure that tables do not disclose details of any company. The raw data will not be shared with any other organisations.

The CSO would like to thank businesses that responded to the Business Impact of COVID-19 Survey.

Sample

The reporting statistical unit for the BICS is the enterprise. The sample size for the BICS is approximately 3,000 enterprises. The enterprise is defined as the smallest combination of legal units that is an organisational unit producing goods and/or services, which benefits from a certain degree of autonomy in decision-making.

There was a response rate of 27.9% to the third wave of the survey . It is important to note that the results of the survey apply to respondents only, and that no imputation or estimation procedures have been used in the case of non-response. The CSO acknowledges that not all businesses may be in a position to respond to the survey. Therefore, as the results of the survey are unweighted, they may only reflect the characteristics of those who have responded.

Enterprises of all size classes were surveyed. The sectors of economic activity included in the survey were determined in accordance with the NACE Rev. 2 classification scheme, which is the European Commission’s classification system for economic activity. The NACE Rev. 2 sectors included in the survey were as follows:

Sector B:          Mining and quarrying

Sector C:          Manufacturing

Sector D:          Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply

Sector E:          Water supply; sewerage, waste management and remediation activities

Sector F:          Construction

Sector G:          Wholesale and retail trade; Repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles

Sector H:          Transportation and storage

Sector I:            Accommodation and food service activities

Sector J:           Information and communication

Sector K:           Financial and insurance activities

Sector L:           Real estate activities   

Sector M:          Professional, scientific and technical activities

Sector N:          Administrative and support service activities

Sector R:          Arts, entertainment and recreation

Sector S:          Other service activities

Please note that some more granular NACE Rev. 2 descriptions were also referenced in the text of this release. For further information on the NACE Rev. 2 classification scheme, please click Classifications

Data Collection and Questionnaire

The survey is collected via an online questionnaire. The topics covered are about how the COVID-19 crisis has affected business and what steps have been taken as a result – e.g. in relation to the level of business, workforce and organisational changes, access to finance, and availing of Government support schemes.

The following is a link to the questionnaire for each wave of the BICS survey:Business Impact of COVID-19 Survey

Output Classifications - Definitions

Size Class

For the BICS, the size class of an enterprise is determined by the number of persons engaged associated with the enterprise as follows:

Size Class  Number of Persons Engaged
Micro  0 - 9
Small  10 - 49
Medium  50 - 249
SMEs  0 - 249
Large  250+

A Small or Medium Enterprise (SME) is essentially an amalgamation of the Micro, Small and Medium categories, i.e. having 0-249 persons engaged.

Sector

In the above results, there are cases where several NACE Rev. 2 categories are presented in aggregate form as follows:

Sector    NACE Rev. 2 Category
Industry  B-E
Construction    F
Wholesale and Retail  G
Services  H-N, R-S

Note: Some of the data presenting in the release separate Accommodation and Food Services (NACE I) from Services.


Other Breakdowns
 

Many of the breakdowns in this release are based on the enterprise’s own best estimate at a point in time. The qualitative nature of these breakdowns has been chosen to limit burden on respondents.

upArrowHide Background Notes