Back to Top

 Skip navigation

Condition Accounts

The Forests and Woodlands 2012-2022 Frontier Series release was published on 20 March 2024, however, Coillte has since notified the CSO that the data it provided on the area of forests and woodlands for 2012 and 2015 has been revised. As a result of this, the CSO will update this publication based on the new input data, which will change the Extent and Tree Cover Density data for those years. We will notify users when these revisions have been applied.

Mean Deadwood volume per hectare in Forests & Woodlands rose by almost 30% between 2012 and 2022

CSO statistical publication, , 11am
A CSO Frontier Series Output

This publication is categorised as a CSO Frontier Series Output. Particular care must be taken when interpreting the statistics in this release as it may use new methods which are under development and/or data sources which may be incomplete, for example new administrative data sources. 

Condition Accounts

Condition accounts record the condition of ecosystems in terms of selected characteristics at specific points in time. Over time, these accounts can be used to examine changes in condition, and provide information on the health and function of ecosystems and their capacity to provide ecosystem services.

For Forests & Woodlands, we have chosen two condition indicators to present in this initial set of accounts, Deadwood and Tree Cover Density. Deadwood represents an important resource for biodiversity, so including Deadwood as a measure of condition can give an indication of the health and functioning of the ecosystem. Tree Cover Density can vary depending on factors such as age of forest, timber harvesting, forest fires, or losses due to storm or disease. In general, higher Tree Cover Density is related to higher condition of Forests & Woodlands. Data for both of these indicators were compiled for the reference period (2012-2022), and are shown in Table 3.1. For Deadwood, an increase was seen between 2012 and 2022 of over 3m3/ha. Tree Cover Density increased from 51.8% to 58.8% betwen 2012 and 2018 (the latest year for which data were available).

When constructing condition accounts, it is useful to include reference level values to provide context to the variable values. By using reference level values, we can rescale the indicator values to between 0 and 1, where a value closer to 1 indicates better condition (see Background Notes for details). This allows us to see at a glance what the condition indicator is showing, and also allows us to compare different indicators. In this case, the indicator values for Deadwood increased from 0.38 to 0.60, a percentage change of over 55%. The indicator values for Tree Cover Density increased from 0.58 to 0.66, an increase of more than 13%. Using indicators like these can provide general information on the condition of an ecosystem and are important for tracking trends over time. Because just two indicators are used to represent all of the Forests & Woodlands in a country, however, they must be interpreted carefully and with an understanding of the limitations involved in using them in this way. This is a first attempt at examining the use of these indicators in the context of ecosystem condition accounts for Forests & Woodlands. Further development of condition accounts, to include additional biotic and abiotic indicators, will be undertaken by the CSO to develop a condition index which can be used in the future to track changes in the condition of Forests & Woodlands. 

Table 3.1 Ecosystem condition accounts for Forests & Woodlands 2012-2022
 Variable values Reference level values1 Indicator values (rescaled)2  
Condition indicatorOpening value (2012)Closing value3 (2022) Lower levelUpper level Opening value (2012)Closing value (2022)Change in indicator Change in indicator (%)
Deadwood (m3/ha)10.914.1 5.120.2 0.380.600.21 55.2
Tree Cover Density (%)51.858.8 0.089.5 0.580.660.08 13.5
1 Reference values for Deadwood taken from National Forest Inventory 2022. Reference values for Tree Cover Density taken from Maes et al. 2023. See Background Notes for details
2 Indicator = (V-VL)/(VH-VL), where V = variable, VH is the high condition score, and VL is the low condition score
3 Closing value for Tree Cover Density from 2018

Deadwood

The National Forest Inventories provide detailed information not only on the overall amount of Deadwood, but on the types of Deadwood and the types of forests in which it occurs. The total volume of Deadwood in Forests & Woodlands increased from 7 million m3 in 2012 to 10.175 million m3 in 2022. Figure 3.1, Table 3.2. 

X-axis labelBroadleavedConiferousMixed
20124.8391.1770.983
20177.1511.8581.463
20227.2651.411.499
Table 3.2 Deadwood volume ('000 m3)1 in Forests & Woodlands (2012-2022)
 2012 2017 2022
Deadwood typeBroadleavedConiferousMixedAll stocked forests BroadleavedConiferousMixedAll stocked forests BroadleavedConiferousMixedAll stocked forests
Lying2,1765774723,225 3,4989496755,122 2,6175986843,899
Standing1,5804492842,313 1,7635453582,666 2,9445714563,971
Stumps1,0821512281,462 1,8903644302,685 1,7032423602,305
All deadwood4,8391,1779837,000 7,1511,8581,46310,472 7,2651,4101,49910,175
1 Data from National Forest Inventory

Tree Cover Density

Overall, the Tree Cover Density of Forests & Woodlands increased from 51.8% to 58.8% between 2012 and 2018. In general, higher Tree Cover Density can be associated with better condition, as events resulting in reduced tree coverage such as timber harvesting, forest fires, or losses of trees due to storm or disease have a negative impact on the condition of the forest. Increases were seen in all types of forest, with the exception of Transitional forests. Broadleaved forests had an increase of around 46%, from 39.8% to 58.2%, Coniferous forests increased by about 10%, from 54.5% to 59.9%, and Mixed forests increased by around 31%, from 51.7% to 67.7%. For Broadleaved, Coniferous, and Mixed forests the Tree Cover Density of the Immature forests (i.e. those which were established in the previous six years) was much lower than the Mature forests. The Tree Cover Density of Transitional forests decreased by just over half, from 33.5% to 15.4%. Figure 3.2, Table 3.3.

X-axis labelBroadleavedConiferousMixedTransitionalAll Forests & Woodlands
201239.854.551.733.551.8
201541.355.553.718.452.2
201858.259.967.715.458.8
Table 3.3 Tree Cover Density of Forests & Woodlands 2012-20181
 Tree Cover Density (%)
Ecosystem type (Level 2)201220152018
Broadleaved - Immature5.710.016.2
Broadleaved - Mature43.344.460.7
Broadleaved - All age categories39.841.358.2
    
Coniferous - Immature13.19.18.5
Coniferous - Mature58.061.066.2
Coniferous - All age categories54.555.559.9
    
Mixed - Immature12.319.421.6
Mixed - Mature54.855.569.4
Mixed - All age categories51.753.767.7
    
Transitional33.518.415.4
    
Total Forests & Woodlands51.852.258.8
1Tree Cover Density data for 2021 were not available at time of writing