In 2019, the ‘at risk of poverty’ rate was 12.8% compared with 14.0% in 2018. While the change between 2018 and 2019 is not statistically significant, there is a statistically significant change in the at risk of poverty rate between 2017 (15.7%) and 2019. See table 3.1 & figure 3.1.
An individual is defined as being at risk of poverty if their nominal equivalised disposable income is under the at risk of poverty threshold, i.e. 60% of the median nominal equivalised disposable income. See At Risk of Poverty Indicators Explained (Pdf 717kb).
X-axis label | At Risk of Poverty | Deprivation | Consistent Poverty | Deprivation rate for those at risk of poverty |
---|---|---|---|---|
2004 | 19.4 | 14.1 | 6.6 | 33.8 |
2005 | 18.3 | 14.8 | 7 | 38 |
2006 | 17 | 14 | 6.6 | 38.6 |
2007 | 16.5 | 11.8 | 5.1 | 31.1 |
2008 | 14.4 | 13.7 | 4.2 | 29.1 |
2009 | 14.1 | 17.1 | 5.5 | 38.8 |
2010 | 14.7 | 22.6 | 6.3 | 42.9 |
2011 | 16 | 24.5 | 6.9 | 43.2 |
2012 | 16.9 | 27 | 8.2 | 48.8 |
2013 | 16.2 | 30.5 | 9 | 55.3 |
2014 | 16.7 | 28.9 | 8.3 | 49.7 |
2015 | 16.3 | 25.4 | 8.5 | 51.9 |
2016 | 16.2 | 21 | 8.2 | 50.4 |
2017 | 15.7 | 18.8 | 6.7 | 42.8 |
2018 | 14 | 15.1 | 5.6 | 40.3 |
2019 | 12.8 | 17.8 | 5.5 | 42.7 |
An analysis by socio-demographic characteristics showed that those most at risk of poverty in 2019 were those individuals who were not at work due to illness or disability (37.5%) and individuals who were unemployed (35.4%). This compares with an at risk of poverty rate of 4.6% for those that described their principal economic status as ‘at work’. See figure 3.2.
X-axis label | At Risk of Poverty | Deprivation | Consistent Poverty |
---|---|---|---|
At work | 4.6 | 11.4 | 1.3 |
Unemployed | 35.4 | 36 | 20.2 |
Student | 19.4 | 17.3 | 5.4 |
Home duties | 22.8 | 24.2 | 9.9 |
Retired | 11.1 | 9.4 | 2.1 |
Not at work due to permanent illness or disability | 37.5 | 43.3 | 18.1 |
The at risk of poverty rate for individuals in households with one adult and one or more children aged under 18 was 29.7%, compared with 6.1% for persons in households composed of two adults, where at least one is aged 65 or over and there are no children under 18.
At risk of poverty rate anchored at a moment in time
For a given year, the “at risk of poverty rate anchored at a moment in time” is the share of the population whose income in a given year is below the at risk of poverty threshold calculated in the standard way for a previous base year and then adjusted for inflation. The purpose of this indicator is to get some indication of the changes in ‘absolute poverty’ over time. The deflator is derived from the monthly CPI and takes into account the rolling nature of the income data collected by SILC.
In 2019, the at risk of poverty rate anchored at 2004 was 4.7%, compared with 19.4% in 2004.
X-axis label | At Risk of Poverty Anchored at 2004 | At Risk of Poverty |
---|---|---|
2004 | 19.4 | 19.4 |
2005 | 17.9 | 18.3 |
2006 | 15.7 | 17 |
2007 | 11.5 | 16.5 |
2008 | 10.3 | 14.4 |
2009 | 10.9 | 14.1 |
2010 | 13.2 | 14.7 |
2011 | 16.1 | 16 |
2012 | 18.3 | 16.9 |
2013 | 18.2 | 16.2 |
2014 | 17.7 | 16.7 |
2015 | 14.5 | 16.3 |
2016 | 12.9 | 16.2 |
2017 | 11.1 | 15.7 |
2018 | 6.6 | 14 |
2019 | 4.7 | 12.8 |
Impact of social transfers on the at risk of poverty rate
In 2019, if all social transfers and pension income were excluded from income, the ‘at risk of poverty’ rate would have been 41.4%, little changed from the 2018 rate of 40.9%. In the period since 2004, the ‘at risk of poverty’ rate without social transfers peaked at 50.7% in 2011 and was at its lowest in 2004 (39.8%). The general decrease between 2011 and 2019 shows a decreasing dependence of individuals on social transfers to remain above the ‘at risk of poverty’ threshold during this period. See table 3.3. & figure 3.4.
X-axis label | Including all Social Transfers (60% median income threshold) | Including Old-Age and Survivors' Benefits but Excluding all Other Social Transfers | Excluding all Social Transfers |
---|---|---|---|
2004 | 19.4 | 32.7 | 39.8 |
2005 | 18.3 | 31.9 | 40 |
2006 | 17 | 32.2 | 40.2 |
2007 | 16.5 | 33.1 | 40.9 |
2008 | 14.4 | 34.6 | 43 |
2009 | 14.1 | 36 | 46.2 |
2010 | 14.7 | 39.1 | 50.2 |
2011 | 16 | 39.8 | 50.7 |
2012 | 16.9 | 39.1 | 50.2 |
2013 | 16.2 | 38.1 | 49.5 |
2014 | 16.7 | 37.1 | 49 |
2015 | 16.3 | 34.7 | 46.2 |
2016 | 16.2 | 33.4 | 44.9 |
2017 | 15.7 | 32.3 | 43.8 |
2018 | 14 | 30.2 | 40.9 |
2019 | 12.8 | 30.6 | 41.4 |
Up until 2019 the CSO published Deprivation results as part of annual SILC publication. In 2020 these results were published in a separate earlier release. See SILC: Enforced Deprivation 2019.
In 2019, 17.8% of the population were defined as living in enforced deprivation, i.e. experienced two or more of the eleven types of deprivation. This compares with 15.1% in 2018 and a high of 30.5% in 2013. The increase in the enforced deprivation rate between 2018 and 2019 was statistically significant.
Deprivation by poverty status
The deprivation rate for those at risk of poverty was 42.7% in 2019 compared with a high of 55.3% in 2013. The deprivation rate for those not at risk of poverty was 14.2% in 2019, compared with a high of 25.8% in 2013. See table 3.3.
The consistent poverty measure is defined as people who are both at risk of poverty and experiencing enforced deprivation. The consistent poverty rate in 2019 was 5.5% compared with 5.6% in 2018, this is not a statistically significant change. See table 3.1 & figure 3.1.
An analysis of consistent poverty rates by principal economic status shows that the consistent poverty rate was highest among unemployed individuals (20.2%) and lowest among those who were at work (1.3%) and those who were retired (2.1%).
Further analysis of consistent poverty rates by household composition shows that individuals living in households where there was one adult and one or more children aged under 18 had the highest consistent poverty rate at 17.1%. The consistent poverty rate was lowest for individuals living in households where there were two more adults, with at least one aged 65 or over, and no children (1.0%).
X-axis label | At Risk of Poverty | Deprivation | Consistent Poverty |
---|---|---|---|
1 adult aged 65 years and over | 17.6 | 14.3 | 4.1 |
1 adult aged less than 65 years | 28.8 | 20.9 | 10 |
2 adults, at least 1 aged 65 years and over | 6.1 | 9.3 | 1 |
2 adults, both aged less than 65 years | 10 | 11.2 | 4.2 |
3 or more adults | 6.7 | 14.1 | 2.1 |
1 adult, with children under 18 years | 29.7 | 45.4 | 17.1 |
2 adults, with 1-3 children under 18 years | 11.9 | 17.1 | 6.1 |
Other households with children under 18 years | 12.7 | 22.1 | 5.2 |
The male and female consistent poverty rates were 5.4% and 5.6% respectively. In terms of age, children aged 0-17 were most likely to be in consistent poverty (8.1%), followed by persons aged 18-64 (5.1%) and those aged 65 and over (2.3%).
An analysis of consistent poverty rates by tenure status shows that the rate for those living in owner-occupied dwellings was 1.8% compared with 13.5% for those living in renting accommodation.
At Risk of Poverty | Deprivation | Consistent Poverty | |
Owner-occupied | 7.3 | 10.3 | 1.8 |
Rented or rent free | 24.8 | 34.4 | 13.5 |
Statbank Tables are here
Go to next chapter >>> Annex
Learn about our data and confidentiality safeguards, and the steps we take to produce statistics that can be trusted by all.