Back to Top

 Skip navigation

Details of 1-year Fine Sentence Re-offending

    These statistics are categorised as Under Reservation. This categorisation indicates that the quality of these statistics do not meet the standards required of official statistics published by the CSO.

    For further information please refer to the Under Reservation FAQ page.

Open in Excel:

This chapter describes the characteristics of persons who received a fine sentence sanction from a court for their offence during the reference year. Fine sentences are court decisions that order persons to pay a fine or alternatively face a period in custody. As the majority of fine sentences are resolved without a custodial sentence (96% in 2017), and do not involve a period of detention in prison, the time period to a re-offence is calculated from the court outcome date. Further detail is available in the Background Notes.

A higher proportion of younger people are linked to re-offending one year after receiving fine sentences from the courts. In 2017 persons aged under 21 were most likely to re-offend (44%) after receiving a fine sentence. In contrast, just 21.8% of persons aged 50 and over re-offended. At an overall level, 33% of individuals that received a fine sentence reoffended in 2017. See Table 5.1 and Figure 5.1.

Table 5.1 Individuals who received fine sentences in 2017 classified by 1-year re-offending indicator and age at time of sentencing

Re-offended within 1 yearDid not re-offend within 1 year
< 21 years4456
21 - 25 years37.562.5
26 - 30 years32.767.3
31 - 35 years32.667.4
36 - 40 years38.261.8
41 - 50 years26.473.6
Aged 50 and over21.878.2
Open in Excel:

The majority of offenders that received a fine sentence in 2017 were males (1,598). Of the 508 females who received fine sentences in 2017, 29.5% were linked to a re-offending indicator while over a third (34.2%) of males were linked to a re-offence. See Table 5.2 and Figure 5.2.

Table 5.2 Individuals who received fine sentences in 2017 classified by 1-year re-offending indicator and sex

Fine sentence sanctions
Male1598
Female508
Open in Excel:

The number of fine sentence sanctions issued by courts in 2017 mostly occurred in relation to the offence category “Offences against Government, justice procedures and organisation of crime” (1,144). The highest proportion of re-offending (47.4%) also took place in relation to that offence group. See Table 5.3 and Figure 5.3.

Table 5.3 Individuals who received fine sentences in 2017 classified by 1-year re-offending indicator and offence type

Re-offended within 1 year
15 Offences against Government, justice procedures and organisation of crime47.4
08 Theft and Related Offences34.5
10 Controlled Drug Offences30.8
03 Attempts/Threats to Murder, assaults, harassments and related offences28.6
12 Damage to Property and the Environment27.3
13 Public Order and Social Code Offences26
16 Offences not elswhere classified12.9
14 Road and Traffic Offences12.3
09 Fraud, Deception and Related Offences5.7
04 Dangerous or Negligent Acts2.6
Open in Excel:

Individuals who re-offend having received a fine sentence relating to “Offences against government, justice procedures” mostly re-offend in the same incident category. In 2017, of the total 542 re-offenders in this category almost half (268) re-offended in the same incident type. See Table 5.4.

Table 5.4 Fine sentence re-offenders (1-year) in 2017 classified by original offence and subsequent re-offending incident

Go to next chapter: Historical Re-offending Indicators