Back to Top

 Skip navigation

Unit Labour Cost: Labour Productivity in Context

Open in Excel:

The following section gives an overview of nominal unit labour costs in Ireland, in the Foreign and Domestic and Other sectors, as well as comparing them to our international counterparts. As in previous sections, a few Domestic and Other sectors will be presented to provide further insight into the results.

X-axis labelNominal Unit Labour Cost
20004.25085206279671
20017.24678730182927
20020.571033142366813
20037.14163581167161
20043.41737677123138
20054.2196121781007
20064.43424119936692
20072.32729497324949
20085.76465059791985
2009-2.54948887444585
2010-8.22213690253741
2011-2.45302644198302
20122.33329210360934
20130.95059743268236
2014-3.93713488056985
2015-15.741688314626
20161.24750286736131
2017-1.23347786540866
2018-2.40630647281255

Source publication: National Income and Expenditure 2018 Tables 1-22 and Annex 1 for 1995-2018 (XLS 396KB) , Macroeconomic Scoreboard

Get the data: Statbank PIA04 

Nominal unit labour costs (ULC), which are explained in more detail in the appendix, are comparable to labour productivity trends. Nominal unit labour cost measures nominal hourly employee compensation relative to real labour productivity. Growth in an economy’s unit labour cost suggests that nominal employee income is rising relative to real labour productivity, resulting in decreased competitiveness. On the other hand, a decline in unit labour cost suggests that nominal labour compensation is declining relative to labour productivity, resulting in increased competitiveness. In 2018, unit labour costs declined even further on 2017, recording a result of -2%, indicating increased competitiveness. All the inputs of COE, Employee and Self-Employed numbers as well as GVA recorded growth in 2018 contributed to this result. The result has also been supported by the strong results recorded in sectors such as Manufacturing and ICT.

X-axis labelNominal unit labour costNominal employee compensationReal labour productivity
20004.250852062796717.621622599066924.00970337350606
20017.246787301829277.649131679339481.1358780987603
20020.5710331423668134.923944776371365.50678529599917
20037.141635811671616.327976781462810.353444437455019
20043.417376771231385.048820378771432.32791917539796
20054.21961217810075.183922833412480.591859298300501
20064.434241199366924.323967790503410.205584598580155
20072.327294973249495.583608484971414.10641528360243
20085.764650597919853.80210430845483-0.65796382709038
2009-2.54948887444585-1.136110906339253.22384371580215
2010-8.22213690253741-2.6541309419024411.7861976851019
2011-2.453026441983020.4292542476172872.03331506346554
20122.333292103609341.01404108775143-1.35970742245664
20130.95059743268236-0.419849669611428-1.67407111758094
2014-3.937134880569850.4058736681005443.71553688751463
2015-15.7416883146262.3177587809881220.5357588157424
20161.247502867361312.15507507178261.35804404135353
2017-1.233477865408662.511249805037913.13159829552463
2018-2.406306472812552.08414425142174.24505259566785

Get the data: Statbank PIA04 

The above chart explains the relationship between nominal employee compensation and labour productivity and provides more information on the drivers of nominal unit labour cost. In 2018, unit labour cost growth recorded a result of -2%. This is explained by labour productivity growing faster at 4% than the growth in wages of 2%, resulting in increased competitiveness. The foreign dominated sectors behind the strong labour productivity growth are presented in Chart 2.7, The chart is quite striking, showing the decreased competitiveness in the years prior to 2008 associated with increased growth in employee compensation and linked to increased wage inflation in the period. However, the increased competitiveness since 2009 has been linked to falling wages and a low inflation environment, as well as some sectors becoming more capital intensive, such as the Construction and Manufacturing sectors.

X-axis labelNominal unit labour costNominal employee compensationReal labour productivity
20007.098012224244458.490313240944912.1369928955367
20017.092352157648376.886252438486320.553227038200199
20025.228368445005575.488367625719321.48921551617462
20036.14431489536796.861944920289131.75809806096234
20043.619171184383935.513740835037742.59314925888905
20055.139517729632034.73879255887507-0.719839228026198
20064.866631315403594.11048251971971-0.467504285720721
20073.616371191894335.603703034705192.82951836248115
20084.947288831217583.586100288194690.0115537811781863
2009-0.662830517835675-1.093499230201371.79436030148423
2010-8.15394755098922-4.49101360678299.75669263125165
2011-2.940403229232980.4774019447809222.66041155316881
20122.981470740174571.10721428518691-1.90759234173513
2013-1.13654219854559-1.59538501116866-0.688065667579352
2014-2.818625190079730.2919706410926282.42559323829936
2015-0.6809715371226792.172636971739432.03664080038735
20161.700855678017811.709858474222360.501662697563821
20170.3312813629841612.108269831442191.06540673529907
20180.6167805781413731.166278529591570.153790310201107

Get the data: Statbank PIA05 

Nominal unit labour cost in the Domestic and Other sector grew at a rate of 1%. This growth has come entirely from wages, while labour productivity recorded no growth. The reason for the absence of growth has been accounted for by similar increases in both GVA growth and hours worked of 3.8%. The same picture emerged for the total economy, where decreased competitiveness was associated with high levels of wage growth in the early noughties, while the post-crisis period has experienced lower levels of wage growth associated with increased competitiveness. In 2010, unit labour cost recorded the lowest growth. This is illustrated in the chart, where labour productivity spiked at over 10%, while employee compensation fell by 4%, as large numbers became unemployed in sectors such as Construction.

X-axis labelNominal Unit Labour Cost
Transport and Storage-3.19976247946418
Accommodation and Food -2.5716437028419
Public Admin and Defence-2.35451394667738
Professional Scientific,
Admin and Support Services
-0.90541442427214
Wholesale and Retail-0.900191669078981
Water Supply and Sewerage-0.301134912005846
Financial and Insurance Activities1.93916768022928
Education2.53199570496118
Construction3.07367007292339
Electricity, Gas and Steam5.291464404173

Get the data: Statbank PIA04 

The chart above shows growth in unit labour costs in some sectors in the Domestic and Other sector in 2018. During this year, the Electricity, Gas and Steam sector, as well as the Construction sector, were the least competitive with growth in unit labour costs of 5% and 3% respectively. The Electricity, Gas and Steam sector experienced a 6% fall in labour productivity, while labour productivity declined in the Construction sector by 2%. As wages were rising faster than labour productivity in these sectors, competitiveness decreased. Transport and Storage and the Accommodation and Food sectors were the most competitive in 2018, reflected in a negative result of -3% in unit labour costs. In fact, Labour productivity grew at 1% and wages per employees fell by 3% in the Transport sector, while labour productivity was unchanged in the Accommodation and Food while wages per employee fell by 3% in the sector.

X-axis labelNominal unit labour costNominal employee compensationReal labour productivity
2000-5.998254743915982.749142115834579.75268984868283
200110.561086437732512.15430691584062.31082103541846
2002-14.07250518437252.9344168551080519.9600363348839
20033.984468410278053.950365944374141.34270618195518
2004-1.311015400750522.251718983145944.17215303083627
20050.8678762513958569.346220307904067.98422295109318
20062.154498396534276.811166534659255.32002529182172
2007-5.015325586169136.6709400831424313.0795634554099
200810.61657140948525.24107114224241-4.72423425490749
2009-6.64819053846737-2.694246825146561.67941383773504
2010-2.6421578507883513.32384247648121.8575906623082
20110.486769526499652-0.398820586364244-2.0302315247873
20120.783881727451644-0.651925275074299-1.05328285593678
201312.15908653785967.65619518916827-4.85221784783799
2014-6.612460078050011.171978514868727.34372955410356
2015-41.52489112869522.5146397960796575.3187966159526
20163.692493707803834.701720810965031.27363424988329
2017-0.7804388772650285.174072819791446.01674496723033
2018-3.521624412216638.1765446895340412.1935250270329

Get the data: Statbank PIA05 

Changes in nominal unit labour cost have been far more volatile for the Foreign sector than the Domestic and Other sector. Unit labour costs declined by 4% in 2018 due to labour productivity growing faster than growth in wages paid. This is indicative of a sector that is predominantly capital intensive, where additions to GVA result in increased labour productivity. In general, the Foreign sector has had large and intermittent decreases and increases in nominal unit labour cost over the period. For example, in 2002 there was a 14% decrease in ULC, largely due to a 20% increase in labour productivity, while 2009 was the only year that had a small fall in employee compensation, largely due to a reduction in the labour force.

X-axis labelNominal Unit Labour Cost
Ireland Foreign-40.9366065072702
Ireland-6.2111801242236
Germany22.7272727272727
Portugal23.1990231990232
Cyprus27.4373259052925
Spain28.1540504648074
Netherlands28.9505428226779
Greece30.3834808259587
France32.4754901960784
Austria32.5608342989571
Ireland Domestic & Other32.7649926064525
Finland32.9253365973072
Belgium33.7740384615385
Sweden41.0348977135981
Italy41.3563829787234
Denmark41.7437252311757
Malta44.3285528031291
United Kingdom46.9038208168643
Slovakia49.5388669301713
Czechia52.3932729624838
Slovenia60.7033639143731
Luxembourg71.4285714285714
Lithuania73.3505821474774
Hungary91.8495297805643
Bulgaria140.65180102916
Estonia144.945848375451
Latvia146.028880866426
Romania315.686274509804

Source publication: Macroeconomic Scoreboard

Get the data: Eurostat

This chart compares cumulative growth in nominal ULC for Ireland compared to the rest of the EU. Ireland was the only country in the EU to have had a cumulative fall in nominal unit labour cost over the entire period. This amounted to a 6% decrease over the period and was driven by developments in the Foreign sector of the Irish economy as dramatic increases in GVA and profits occurred and wages were relatively unchanged. These increases in profits are explained by the additional earnings leveraged off the large additions to capital stocks in the foreign sector. Of the 25 countries detailed in the chart, Ireland was the most competitive[1] country and the Foreign sector was more competitive than the country as a whole. The Domestic and Other sector had the ninth lowest growth in unit labour costs over the period. This has resulted in reduced competitiveness when compared with countries such as Cyprus, Germany and France.

[1] A careful interpretation of competitiveness is required for Foreign Sector in Ireland in this example. The onshoring of IPP has resulted in dramatic increases in income flows which are driving down unit labour costs compounded by no significant change in employment being associated with these balance sheet developments.


Go to the next chapter: Inputs to Economic Growth by Year