Back to Top

 Skip navigation

Unit Labour Cost: Labour Productivity in Context

Open in Excel:
X-axis labelNominal Unit Labour Cost
20002.8734
20015.2144
20020.468823
20035.19455
20041.92351
20054.17281
20063.52725
20074.91083
20087.5204978
2009-4.4632
2010-9.1307965
2011-2.5903
2012-0.32846
20131.0662
2014-4.44
2015-16.6154532
2016-0.21453

Source publication:  National Income & Expenditure Annual Results, Macroeconomic Scoreboard

Get the data: StatBank PIA01

Nominal unit labour costs (ULC), which are explained in more detail in the Appendix, are comparable to labour productivity trends. Nominal unit labour cost measures nominal hourly employee compensation relative to real labour productivity. Growth in an economy’s unit labour cost suggests that nominal employee income is rising relative to real labour productivity, resulting in decreased competitiveness. On the other hand, a decline in unit labour cost suggests that nominal labour compensation is declining relative to labour productivity, resulting in increased competitiveness.

The cost of labour in Ireland increased rapidly relative to overall output from 2000 to 2008. Since 2009, however, nominal unit labour costs have declined substantially to just under ninety percent of their 2000 level.

X-axis labelNominal Unit Labour CostNominal Employee CompensationReal Labour Productivity
20002.87347.87277144.85973
20015.21447.96027032.60978
20020.4688235.154164.66347
20035.194556.49877171.23982
20041.923515.165043.18036
20054.172815.25971.04335
20063.527254.417310.85974
20074.910835.752790.80255
20087.52049783.94287-3.3274
2009-4.4632-1.13113.4878
2010-9.1307965-3.58396.10431
2011-2.59030.868373.55067
2012-0.328460.2937470.624254
20131.06620.205438-0.8517
2014-4.441.804626.5347484
2015-16.61545322.1157622.4636553
2016-0.214532.042132.26152

Get the data: StatBank PIA02

The above chart explains the relationship between nominal employee compensation and labour productivity. Labour compensation per employee increased at a much faster rate than output relative to total employment from 2000 to 2007. This resulted in growth rates in nominal ULC that were often close to five percent. Labour compensation continued to increase in 2008 (although at a lower rate), while output relative to total employment fell. This resulted in the largest increase in nominal ULC of over seven percent. Since 2009, real output relative to total employment has had major increases. Labour compensation, which initially declined in 2009 and 2010, has grown. Since 2011 growth in nominal labour compensation has turned positive and since 2014 compensation has increased at a rate of two percent.

X-axis labelNominal Unit Labour CostNominal Employee CompensationReal Labour Productivity
20006.85278418.78952831.81254
20015.895497.11527961.15188
20024.027035.840511.74327
20035.632497.06268441.35393
20043.055985.614882.48302
20054.444644.864450.401947
20063.542174.135560.573086
20074.52965.800941.21625
20084.678183.72395-0.9116
2009-2.1019-1.10881.0144
2010-9.2543547-4.07635.70609
2011-3.8905-0.212963.8264
20121.454740.0023348-1.4316
2013-0.72378-0.460560.265132
2014-2.48951.787064.38572
2015-2.9811.584844.70613
2016-0.374332.12692.51063

Get the data: StatBank PIA02

Nominal unit labour cost for the Domestic and Other sector grew consistently at a rate of close to five percent between 2000 and 2008. This was a result of nominal employee compensation increasing well above real labour productivity throughout. From 2009 to 2011, nominal unit labour cost declined as a result of increased labour productivity and falls in labour compensation. Nominal unit labour cost fell again from 2014 to 2016. However, this time employee compensation increased with real labour productivity increasing at an even greater rate.

X-axis labelNominal Unit Labour CostNominal Employee CompensationReal Labour Productivity
2000-5.80862.804769.1445861
20019.708937713.24267753.22101
2002-14.78626932.4913620.275636
20033.50074.158280.635341
2004-1.00942.655893.70269
2005-0.253899.36504639.6434189
20062.702377.6761064.84286
2007-4.48886.834369811.8553409
20088.69690285.44593-2.9909
2009-8.0549988-2.69535.82921
2010-5.9976-0.506035.84193
2011-8.135141212.223779622.1618158
20121.796372.014890.214659
20136.5672125.33973-1.1518
2014-6.8414981.979999.469335
2015-41.22539925.1472378.8991033
20160.3951251.578461.17868

Get the data: StatBank PIA02

Changes in nominal unit labour cost have been far more volatile for the Foreign sector than the Domestic and Other sector. The Foreign sector has had large and intermittent decreases and increases in nominal unit labour cost. For example, in 2002 there was a 15 percent decrease in ULC, and the years 2009 and 2010 were the only years that had falls in employee compensation. Moreover, nominal unit labour cost fell by over 40 percent in 2015 as a result of a major increase in labour productivity due to the extraordinary growth rate in that year.

X-axis labelNominal Unit Labour Cost
Ireland - Foreign-51.77
Ireland-6.66
Ireland - Domestic & Other15.02
Germany18
Croatia19
Portugal19
Poland20
Netherlands26
Spain28
Greece28
Belgium29
Austria30
Cyprus30
France31
Sweden33
Finland36
Denmark38
Czech Republic39
Italy39
Slovakia39
United Kingdom42
Malta43
Slovenia55
Luxembourg56
Lithuania58
Hungary72
Bulgaria117
Estonia123
Latvia127
Romania227

Source publication: Macroeconomic Scoreboard

Get the data: Eurostat

This chart compares cumulative growth in nominal ULC for Ireland compared to the rest of the EU. Despite having had one of the highest levels of growth in nominal ULC from 2000 to 2008, Ireland is the only country in the EU to have had a cumulative fall in nominal unit labour cost over the entire period. This negative result is driven by developments in the Foreign sector of the Irish economy, in particular the dramatic additions to GVA in 2015. The Domestic and Other sector on its own has had the lowest increase in nominal unit labour cost relative to the rest of the EU.

Go to the next chapter: Inputs to Economic Growth by Year