Back to Top

 Skip navigation

Headline Indicators

Open in Excel:

External Imbalances

Indicator 1: Current Account Balance

Current Account Balance (% of GDP)Upper MIP Threshold Lower MIP Threshold
2006-2.99632570968076-4
2007-5.131360294279476-4
2008-6.031277989744486-4
2009-5.802321681367076-4
2010-4.034867431737936-4
2011-2.495651435904846-4
2012-1.814931932680326-4
2013-0.7016095799181096-4
20140.3924180447377866-4
20154.674120302964716-4

*Note there are some small differences between the CSO/Eurostat Current Account Balance values for 2008-2011 related to data vintages.

Source publication: Balance of International Payments

Get the dataStatBank BPA15StatBank N1505 (Gross Domestic Product)

The current account balance is mainly driven by exports less imports, although it also includes net income and current transfers in and out of Ireland, as shown in the CSO note on Net Factor Income (PDF 222KB) . As part of the Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure (MIP), the current account balance is expressed as a three year average in terms of a percentage of GDP. A positive current account balance usually indicates that exports are greater than imports and vice versa. From 2006 to 2013, Ireland ran a current account deficit (measured as a three year average) and surpassed the lower MIP threshold from 2007 to 2009. The current account became less negative from 2009-2013. It became positive from 2014 onwards with a substantial shift seen in 2015 as a result of the relocation of companies to Ireland and their associated contract manufacturing exports. 

Supplementary analysis:

Current Account Balance (% of GDP)Current Account Balance minus effect of redomiciled PLCsUpper MIP ThresholdLower MIP Threshold
2006-2.89706277029376-2.897062770293766-4
2007-4.85859440865447-4.858594408654476-4
2008-6.11780961565443-6.169669005667246-4
2009-6.37305740190764-6.743506340451616-4
2010-4.31456084504121-5.73984985200616-4
2011-2.45103137458832-4.839660253076796-4
2012-1.78791568518118-5.184708930285136-4
2013-0.658494673776929-4.196423782016076-4
20140.423310554290053-3.102954372886046-4
20154.327997446071051.970955573363566-4
Table 2 Effects of Redomiciled PLCs on Current Account Balance, 2006-2015 (% of GDP, 3 year average)

The presence of redomiciled PLCs (also called corporate inversions) also affects the Current Account Balance in the Irish economy. Beginning in 2008, possibly as a reaction to proposed changes to corporate tax in the United Kingdom and the United States, a number of multinational corporations relocated their group headquarters to Ireland. Many of these companies conduct little manufacturing or service activity in Ireland, but hold substantial investments overseas. By locating their headquarters in Ireland, the profits or losses on these overseas investments are payable to the company in Ireland, even though under double taxation agreements their tax liability arises in other jurisdictions. These profit inflows are retained in Ireland with a corresponding outflow only arising when a dividend is paid to the foreign shareholders.

While these companies are considered domestic firms under internationally comparable statistics, users may also wish to understand the effect that redomiciled PLCs have on the balance of payments. From the above figure we can infer that 2010 onwards, redomiciled PLCs have had a large positive effect on the balance of payments. Without their presence in the economy, the three year average of Ireland’s current account balance would continue to be negative well into 2014 and would have been below the lower MIP threshold until 2013. More information on redomiciled PLCs can be found here (PDF 183KB) .

Indicator 2: International Investment Position

Net IIP (% of GDP)MIP Threshold
2006-25.7512387807264-35
2007-31.3706010856949-35
2008-95.7519700352182-35
2009-116.808089379154-35
2010-114.882961154592-35
2011-138.263708326111-35
2012-137.27824117801-35
2013-131.666564932939-35
2014-162.147442534686-35
2015-207.997576373551-35
Table 3 Net International Investment Position, 2006-2015 (% of GDP)

Source publication: International Investment Position and External Debt

Get the data: StatBank BPQ26

The International Investment Position (IIP) expresses the balance sheet stock of an economy's foreign financial assets and its foreign financial liabilities.

The Net IIP for Ireland has been well outside the MIP threshold of -35% since 2008.

Supplementary analysis:

Central BankGeneral GovernmentMonetary Financial Institutions Non-financial CorporationsOther Sectors MIP Threshold
2012-44.2483187964432-61.3755197645261-4.90041854151196-66.502492301453939.748508225925-35
2013-28.4949707198139-60.1611083160102-10.164133118066-65.843042171502332.9966893924534-35
2014-9.32990568269797-68.3282465907425-6.02622117204792-99.073410271260920.610341182063-35
20150.649136302494592-51.74400364481311.25210859089832-176.17570335643618.0208857343052-35
Table 4 Breakdown of Net International Investment Position, 2012-2015 (% of GDP)

Get the data: StatBank BPQ22

In the above table, we are using the new institutional sector breakdown available in BPM6. In particular this classification shows the Non-financial Corporate sector (S.11) and its contribution to the Net IIP. In 2015 the Non-financial Corporate sector's net debt to non-residents amounted to 176% of GDP, up from 99% in 2014 and 66% in 2013. It can be seen that the largest contributing components to the negative IIP came from the Government and Non-financial Corporation sectors. From 2013 onwards a substantial reduction can be seen in the contribution of the Central Bank to the Net IIP. 

Competitiveness Indicators

Indicator 3: Real Effective Exchange Rate

Real Effective Exchange Rate (3 year % change)Upper MIP ThresholdLower MIP Threshold
20062.75-5
20073.15-5
20087.35-5
20095.15-5
2010-5.45-5
2011-9.65-5
2012-12.15-5
2013-3.95-5
2014-3.55-5
2015-5.95-5

Get the data: Eurostat database

The Real Effective Exchange Rate (REER) is a country’s exchange rate relative to a basket of exchange rates of other countries weighted according to their respective trade shares. A change in it, therefore, aims to assess a country's price or cost competitiveness relative to its principal competitors in international markets. A positive value indicates real appreciation and a loss of country competitiveness relative to principal trading partners. A negative value indicates improving country competitiveness relative to its principal trading partners. Changes in cost and price competitiveness depend on cost and price trends as well as exchange rate movements. This specific REER for the Macroeconomic Imbalance Procedure is deflated by the consumer price indices relative to a panel of 42 countries.

The REER estimates from 2006 to 2009 follow a positive trend which changes from 2010 onwards following the financial crisis (Figure 6). From 2010 to 2012 the lower MIP threshold of -5% was breached followed by a recovery period during 2013 and 2014. In 2015 the indicator has a value of -5.9%, just outside the threshold level, indicating increased competitiveness.

Supplementary analysis:

IrelandEU-28 AverageGermanyNetherlandsUnited KingdomUSA (Real Broad Effective Exchange Rate)
20062.72.846428571-1.5-2.11.8-6.97850751786474
20073.13.742857143-1.5-2.1-0.4-7.01001702085307
20087.36.1464285710.9-0.1-11.2-9.86900862141393
20095.15.3752.92.6-19.9-4.52702486644558
2010-5.40-3.7-1.5-20.4-3.62165709999999
2011-9.6-2.560714286-4.9-2.4-8.2-4.67456110435199
2012-12.1-4.296428571-8.9-65.9-6.16288747518785
2013-3.9-0.785714286-1.90.43.4-0.892978214160747
2014-3.5-0.635714286-0.30.810.26.01212229107268
2015-5.9-1.067857143-1.4-0.611.313.9155299613098

Get the data: Eurostat databaseWorld Bank database

The pattern of Ireland’s REER has been very similar to other Euro Area countries and to the EU-28 average. However, it has been different to those of the United Kingdom and the USA which have other currencies in circulation. It is important to note that data on the USA is calculated in a different way to Eurostat and therefore is not fully comparable. The indicator for the USA is computed using the World Bank’s World Development Indicators as a three year percentage change.

REER (3 year % change)Upper MIP ThresholdLower MIP Threshold
Czech Republic-85-5
Sweden-7.95-5
Hungary-6.95-5
Cyprus-6.25-5
Ireland-5.95-5
Greece-5.55-5
Bulgaria-4.15-5
Spain-2.95-5
Portugal-2.85-5
France-2.75-5
Italy-2.25-5
Denmark-1.55-5
Germany-1.45-5
Belgium-1.25-5
Poland-15-5
Slovakia-0.75-5
Netherlands-0.65-5
Luxembourg-0.55-5
Malta-0.25-5
Croatia0.15-5
Slovenia0.65-5
Austria1.85-5
Finland2.35-5
Romania2.75-5
Latvia3.15-5
Lithuania45-5
Estonia6.45-5
United Kingdom11.35-5

Get the data: Eurostat database

Figure 8 shows the EU-28 REER values for 2015. Ireland has the fifth lowest percentage change in REER value with the Czech Republic and the United Kingdom experiencing the lowest and highest changes, respectively.

Indicator 4: Export Market Share

Export Market Share (5 year % change)MIP Threshold
2006-9.62-6
2007-11.97-6
2008-16.72-6
20092.03-6
2010-6.77-6
2011-10.47-6
2012-15.65-6
2013-7.54-6
2014-11.97-6
201538.26-6

Source publication: Balance of International Payments

Get the data: Eurostat database

The export market share is calculated by dividing the exports of the country by the total exports of the world. For a country to increase its export market share its exports must increase at a faster rate than world exports. As a result a country’s exports may increase but its export market share may still fall. To capture the structural losses in competitiveness that can accumulate over longer time periods, this indicator is calculated as the percentage change in values compared to five years previously.

During the period from 2006 to 2014, except for 2009, Ireland experienced negative values for this indicator suggesting a decrease in export market shares. In most cases the MIP threshold of -6% was breached. In 2015 there was a change in trend with a percentage increase of 38.3%. This largely relates to the significant increase in the amount of contract manufacturing carried out on behalf of Irish companies in 2015. This rise in contract manufacturing has led to the increase in goods exports from Irish companies and is explained in the note on trade statistics published by the CSO.

Supplementary analysis:

Export Market Share (5 year % change)MIP Threshold
Greece-20.6-6
Finland-20.48-6
Cyprus-16.79-6
Belgium-11.28-6
Austria-9.6-6
Italy-8.92-6
Sweden-8.8-6
Denmark-8.75-6
Netherlands-8.31-6
Hungary-7.96-6
France-5.43-6
Slovenia-3.58-6
Croatia-3.54-6
Spain-3.53-6
Germany-3-6
Malta-2.06-6
Czech Republic0.14-6
United Kingdom2.72-6
Portugal2.79-6
Slovakia6.67-6
Estonia8.53-6
Poland9.74-6
Latvia10.48-6
Bulgaria12.83-6
Lithuania15.49-6
Romania21.13-6
Luxembourg22.93-6
Ireland38.26-6

Get the data: Eurostat database

Many European countries experienced a decline in their export market share in 2015. Ireland’s increase in share of exports was the highest in 2015, surpassing Luxembourg.

IrelandGermanyUnited KingdomNetherlandsChina
2006-9.622.01-8.12-5.1889.3156716914191
2007-11.972.1-15.13-2.4876.1639412518391
2008-16.72-4.52-22.58-6.0851.9844937616642
20092.03-6.53-19.81-5.2243.5467913750483
2010-6.77-7.48-23.49-7.8638.8021266287469
2011-10.47-8.78-25.56-7.9230.1441630953721
2012-15.65-16.01-20.71-12.1729.4436473610136
2013-7.54-11.89-11.96-10.7134.3543765226221
2014-11.97-8.85-9.86-10.8434.7883337508557
201538.26-32.72-8.3134.8370995513706

Get the data: Eurostat databaseWorld Bank database

It can be seen that three of Ireland’s largest EU trading partners have also mainly experienced declining export market shares over time. On the other hand, China has seen increases of over 25% each year during the period, albeit these increases are at a declining rate with the rate of change slowing down over 2013-2015. Note that the country comparison data is sourced from Eurostat, with exception of the data for China which is from the World Development Indicators compiled by the World Bank.

Indicator 5: Nominal Unit Labour Costs

Nominal Unit Labour Cost (3 year % change)MIP Threshold
20069.89
200714.69
200818.52279134582249
20099.661417311198739
2010-6.503988200717349
2011-13.54722415366119
2012-8.255625718271249
20134.037202342103579
2014-0.53974173351579
2015-18.05207200625329

Source publication: National Income & Expenditure Annual Results

Get the data: StatBank N1501 (employee compensation/total labour costs), StatBank QIHQ1 (number of employees), StatBank N1502 (Gross Domestic Product)

The nominal unit labour cost is an index computed using the ratio of labour costs (compensation per employee) to labour productivity (GDP per person employed, including self-employed).

A rise in an economy’s nominal unit labour costs corresponds to the change in labour costs being greater than the change in labour productivity, resulting in lower competitiveness.

During the period 2006-2009 Ireland experienced positive indicator values which breached the MIP threshold of 9% (Figure 12). This trend was reversed after the financial crisis, leading to increased competitiveness in the Irish economy. The three year change in Ireland’s nominal unit labour cost indicator was -18.1% in 2015. Note that this estimate was substantially affected by the level-shift in GDP in 2015.

Supplementary analysis:

Nominal Unit labour costs (3 year % change)Change in Productivity (3 year % change)Change in labour costs (3 year % change)MIP Threshold
200818.5227913458224-3.1594144963789214.77816509452959
20099.66141731119873-0.8957425755564798.679133307383639
2010-6.503988200717345.97677581702074-0.9159411776189569
2011-13.547224153661110.6860061365963-4.308875221463479
2012-8.255625718271246.32857887678139-2.449510626842499
20134.03720234210357-1.394456937688382.586448356267219
2014-0.53974173351574.64639883593774.081578548798869
2015-18.052072006253229.56468425991596.175574162641349

Get the data: Eurostat database (compensation of employees), StatBank N1501 (Gross Domestic Product)

Breaking nominal unit labour costs into its two components shows the interrelationship between labour costs and productivity. Until 2008, labour costs rose at a faster rate than labour productivity compared to their respective levels three years previously (Figure 13). This caused overall increases in nominal unit labour costs. However, between 2010 and 2012 the three year changes in labour costs were continually lower than those in labour productivity. This trend was reversed in 2013. In 2014 the labour costs and labour productivity changed at almost the same rate. In 2015 labour productivity increased at a faster rate than labour costs thereby increasing overall economic competitiveness. Labour productivity increases in 2015 were mainly due to the large increase in GDP.

Internal Indicators

Indicator 6: Deflated House Price Index

House Price Index (annual % change)MIP Threshold
200612.066486966
20074.3373850096
2008-8.4478765796
2009-13.603558076
2010-11.572145286
2011-16.99032776
2012-15.131199846
20131.1648832826
201415.005628086
20158.3323288926

Source publication: Residential Property Price Index 

Get the data: StatBank HPM01 (Residential Property Price Index), StatBank N1505 (Consumption at Current Market Prices by Item and Year), StatBank N1506 (Consumption at Constant Market Prices by Item and Year)

From 2008 to 2012, Ireland experienced a decline in House Price Index (Figure 14) following the financial crisis. In 2014 and 2015 the values of this indicator stood at 15% and 8.3%, respectively, breaching the MIP threshold of 6%. These increases suggest inflation of the Irish housing market relative to the final consumption of households. A decrease in the rate of change in 2015 over 2014 follows the introduction of new lending regulations by the Central Bank.

The Deflated House Price Index is the ratio between the Residential Property Price Index and the National Accounts deflator for private final consumption expenditure for households. This year-on-year indicator measures inflation in the housing market relative to inflation in the final consumption expenditure of households.

The National Accounts deflator for private final consumption expenditure is obtained by dividing final consumption expenditure of households at current market prices (79a) by final consumption expenditure of households at constant market prices (92a). The deflated House Price Index is then calculated by dividing the House Price Index by this deflator.

Supplementary analysis:

OverallDublinExcluding Dublin MIP Threshold
200612.066486958530813.16541110219499.3496716476
20074.337385008672952.375914620346795.0597386876
2008-8.44787657906718-11.8429560308071-7.8074483556
2009-13.6035580654173-23.8987067216677-12.214858966
2010-11.5721452757033-18.1492594127994-10.923702466
2011-16.9903277011997-18.5615338535307-21.774159116
2012-15.1311998424649-14.9525506257955-20.895374086
20131.164883282066048.38800395849607-8.0419896226
201415.005628078530717.06489873882096.1024359546
20158.332328891514657.7553778297369210.094288996

Get the data: StatBank HPM01 (Residential Property Price Index), StatBank N1505 (Consumption at Current Market Prices by Item and Year), StatBank N1506 (Consumption at Constant Market Prices by Item and Year)

Figure 15 shows a comparison of the year-on-year deflated house price index between Dublin and the rest of the country. From 2007 to 2010, Dublin experienced an increased rate of deflation compared to the average of the remaining counties. Similarly, from 2011 to 2014 the rate of inflation was faster for Dublin than the rest of the country.

Indicator 7: Private Sector Credit Flow, consolidated

Private Sector Credit Flow (% of GDP)MIP Threshold
200640.890060116230814
200724.84514607941514
200821.985791600508914
2009-4.5567463644179914
20102.2313707996469214
201116.240553637732914
2012-0.58384512526488714
2013-1.4103829999503214
20142.5446945343623714
2015-6.7050427116669614

Source publication: Annual Institutional Sector Accounts Non-Financial and Financial

Get the data: StatBank IFI04

Private sector credit flow represents the net amount of liabilities (loans and debt securities) which Non-financial Corporations (NFCs, S.11), Households (S.14) and Non-Profit Institutions serving Households (NPISH, S.15) have incurred during the year. Transactions between units within each sector are eliminated to produce a consolidated presentation. The indicator is expressed as a percentage of GDP.

Figure 16 shows the relatively large positive flows of credit in the period 2006-2008, predominantly related to investment in residential and commercial property. Aside from 2011, the indicator has been below the MIP threshold since 2009. The threshold breach in 2011 was caused principally by refinancing operations for large multinational groups during this period. In 2015 private sector credit flows decreased by €22.1bn over the 2014 level, standing at -6.7% of GDP – well below the MIP threshold of 14%.

 Supplementary analysis:

Non-financial CorporationsHouseholdsTotal
200647.476696320275328.194857831422575.6715541516978
200724.120058586460724.897675467999549.0177340544602
200833.72142728664397.5430453946032141.2644726812471
2009-5.71931608503375-2.01366476523815-7.7329808502719
201013.5475085213224-9.81835238612053.72915613520191
201136.9587721037702-8.8512459229457828.1075261808244
20126.44057482644405-7.46670598790209-1.02613116145805
20132.100474776747-4.64211187712746-2.54163710038047
201410.5530736457343-5.637741683164.91533196257434
2015-12.3176987120434-4.83480630080747-17.1525050128508
Table 5 Breakdown of Private Sector Credit Flow, consolidated, 2006-2015 (€ billion)

A breakdown of private sector credit flow shows flows in Non-financial Corporation liabilities to be much greater than flows in Household liabilities from 2006 onwards (Figure 17, Table 5). The scale of credit flow in both sectors has mainly declined since 2005. However, there was a sharp increase in flows of commercial liabilities in 2011, reflecting broad activity in the multinational sector. In 2015 the negative credit flow value of -€12.3bn was related to net repayment of debt by commercial entities.

A positive credit flow equates to a net incurrence of debt during the year whereas a negative sign indicates a net running-down of debt during the same accounting period. The negative credit flows occurring in the Household sector since 2008, cumulatively amounting to €43.3bn, correspond to a net repayment, primarily of mortgage related debt.

Indicator 8: Private Sector Debt, consolidated

Private Sector Debt (% of GDP)MIP Threshold
2006190.493384265646133
2007197.963020104985133
2008236.515887195419133
2009256.686618702198133
2010257.94764961166133
2011270.899738979887133
2012278.765382125518133
2013267.281471131798133
2014281.289326146033133
2015303.37096934038133

Source publication: Annual Institutional Sector Accounts Non-Financial and Financial 

Get the data: StatBank IFI05

Private sector debt is the stock of liabilities in the form of loans and debt securities held by Non-financial Corporations (NFCs, S.11), Households (S.14) and Non-Profit institutions serving Households (NPISH, S.15). Positions between units within each sector are eliminated to produce a consolidated presentation. This reflects the amount of funds that the sector receives from other sectors. The indicator is expressed as a percentage of GDP (Figure 18). For Ireland, this indicator has exceeded the threshold of 133% every year since 2001 (the first year of availability for this time series) and stood at 303% of GDP at the end of 2015.

Supplementary analysis:

NFCs - Foreign ParentNFCs - Irish ParentHouseholdsTotal Private Sector DebtMIP Threshold
200636.432851870464362.901013179438191.4601131518797190.793978201782133
200735.486307167512363.574987455206298.4900630027421197.551357625461133
200852.902304368443275.963538764006108.409078945265237.274922077715133
200967.902936878329371.6871729599774116.951673502098256.541783340404133
201086.792441540413160.3025298580695110.625643234963257.720614633446133
2011103.78745594268265.0761541572774102.258219217658271.121829317617133
2012112.96798.8278.7133
201397.176.693.5267.2133
2014112.886.282.3281.3133
2015167.177.758.5303.3133
Table 6 Breakdown of Private Sector Debt, consolidated, 2006-2015 (% of GDP)

The analysis shown in Figure 19 and Table 6 considers the residency of an NFC’s ultimate controlling parent as the basis for distinguishing between Irish-controlled and foreign-controlled enterprises. The expansion of private sector debt from 2006 to 2009 is driven primarily by growth in property related investment by the Irish private sector. During the period following the financial crisis (circa. 2009-2012), the contribution to overall private sector debt by Irish entities (NFCs and Households) has been decreasing, while the contribution from foreign-owned NFCs has been steadily increasing. From 2013 to 2015, household debt (as a percentage of GDP) has continued to fall. Total private sector debt increased in 2014 and 2015 with notable increases in foreign-parent NFC debt.

Redomiciled PLCsForeign Parent - ROW DebtIrish Parent - ROW DebtForeign Parent - Irish DebtIrish Parent - Irish DebtHouseholdsMIP Threshold
20128.5820896935489468.754653960800811.424238718969341.891436501453349.29918854305698.8135156235093133
201312.935462950241166.314409464522214.793492527575729.660017195255150.034358858602893.5437155590537133
201425.67717598622978.318855390397617.988544501309833.535719482293643.485738778938682.2831332737912133
201528.9448300729042148.44321627121614.8174802677918.737086679024233.957024889536458.4712988960245133
Table 7 Breakdown of Private Sector Debt by Location of Counterparty, 2012-2015 (% of GDP)

In the period since 2008 several large multinational corporations have relocated their head offices to Ireland (i.e. redomiciled PLCs/corporate inversions), becoming an Irish-parent NFC in this analysis. Figure 20 shows a breakdown of private sector debt by location of counterparty – i.e. whether the debt is held with an entity resident in Ireland or outside of Ireland, referred to as the Rest of the World (ROW). This analysis exploits newly available classifications from the BPM6 methodology.

The debt of redomiciled PLCs is shown separately from the other Non-financial Corporations. It is clear that entities with an Irish parent predominantly borrow from Irish counterparties whilst entities with foreign parents are mostly indebted to non-resident counterparties. In 2015, there was a large increase in foreign-parent NFC non-resident (ROW) debt. This was related to corporate restructuring, both for imports of individual assets and also reclassifications of entire balance sheets in 2015.

Indicator 9: General Government Debt

General Government Debt (% of GDP)MIP Threshold
200623.609735378277660
200723.897286235301760
200842.413510818650360
200961.860707239143360
201086.299304166145960
2011109.62322200048160
2012119.49431308209160
2013119.47101706939560
2014105.24942096928960
201578.624720361319160

Source publication: Government Financial Statistics - Annual 

Get the data: StatBank GFQ13

General Government gross debt (GG Debt) comprises liabilities in the financial instruments Currency and Deposits (AF.2), Debt Securities (AF.3) and Loans (AF.4). The scoreboard indicator is obtained by expressing GG Debt as a percentage of GDP.

General government gross debt has grown steadily since 2006 and breached the MIP threshold for the first time in 2009. The year 2015 has seen a further fall in debt to 78.6% of GDP from 105.2% of GDP in 2014 and from the peak in 2012 of 119.5%. The level of General Government gross debt since 2007 has been strongly influenced by the financial crisis, the most significant factor being the state interventions in the banking sector from 2009 onwards. A contributing factor to the reduction in the debt to GDP ratio in 2015 was the significant increase in GDP in this year.

Supplementary analysis:

DepositsDebt SecuritiesLoansMIP Threshold
20064.3622674567021818.1580634374811.0894044840943960
20073.8905021245632818.9495915207641.0571925899744260
20084.7118086769691936.21370847829961.4879936633815460
20096.0735658432043354.11242263756931.6747187583696860
20108.2025111574873357.670195868270620.42659714038860
201133.735717099579554.330867303952721.556637596948960
201235.329201988013649.686796769412634.478314324665260
201317.399770245635562.518963310249839.552283513509960
201410.829318962064561.647485472669532.772616534555360
20158.0969438105820349.084303373638621.443473177098560

Get the data: StatBank GFQ13

This figure shows a breakdown of General Government debt into its constituent debt instruments. The largest amount of growth in debt securities occurred in 2009 to fund government spending. The significant increase in loan liabilities during the years 2010-2013 is predominantly as a result of the EU-IMF Programme of Financial Support. Deposits saw the largest amount of growth in 2011. The growth in the deposit component of debt liabilities in 2011 and 2012 is due mainly to a combination of the reclassification of Irish Bank Resolution Corporation (IBRC) into the Government sector from mid-2011 and the growing participation of the Household sector in state savings schemes since 2008. The further decline in the size of the deposits element of debt in 2015 is related to the liquidation of IBRC. The contribution of loan liabilities to overall General Government debt has continued to decline in 2015, standing, in nominal terms, at €54.9bn. For further information about the classification of IBRC see here.

General Government Gross Debt (% of GDP)MIP Threshold
Estonia10.160
Luxembourg22.160
Bulgaria2660
Latvia36.360
Romania37.960
Czech Republic40.360
Denmark40.460
Lithuania42.760
Sweden43.960
Poland51.160
Slovakia52.560
Finland63.660
Malta6460
Netherlands65.160
Germany71.260
Hungary74.760
Ireland78.660
Slovenia83.160
Austria85.560
Croatia86.760
United Kingdom89.160
France96.260
Spain99.860
Belgium105.860
Cyprus107.560
Portugal12960
Italy132.360
Greece177.460

Get the data: Eurostat database

Ireland’s gross General Government debt as a percentage of GDP was the twelfth highest in the EU in 2015.

Indicator 10: Unemployment Rate

Unemployment Rate (3 year moving average)MIP Threshold
20064.4916666666666710
20074.5416666666666710
20085.210
20097.710
201010.77510
201113.533333333333310
201214.42510
201314.158333333333310
201413.041666666666710
201511.291666666666710

Source publication: Quarterly National Household Survey 

Get the data: StatBank QNQ20

The unemployment rate is the percentage of persons in the labour force who are unemployed. The indicator is derived as a three year average based on the reference year plus the previous two years.

This indicator has exceeded the indicative threshold since 2010 (Figure 24). The average rate of unemployment has decreased from 14.7% in 2012 to 11.3% in 2015. This downward trend has continued into 2016 and 2017.

Supplementary analysis:

Percentage of labour force unemployed and below 25Percentage of labour force unemployed and at least 25MIP Threshold
20061.446288739095813.0130014301225910
20071.452455829669743.0682719327089610
20081.666078250231593.5249086993658210
20092.308361614029295.385795610947210
20102.927370750137677.8265350709962810
20113.3099630392871810.185647542065410
20123.2468748337689611.136298967739710
20133.0041719604811111.109517467565310
20142.6558872353207510.337192686911210
20152.203708933440279.0307681395816110

Get the data: StatBank QNQ24

From 2007 to 2012, the unemployment rate increased both for those aged 15-24 and those aged over 25 (Figure 25). In 2015 the unemployment rate has decreased for both age groups, as it did in 2013 and 2014.

Not stated/Not applicableAgriculture, Forestry and Fishing and other service activitiesWholesale and Retail trade; Repair of motor vehicles and motorcyclesConstructionIndustryMIP Threshold
20061.5204481.3779830.4381030.5593580.57703510
20071.5194581.3838460.4700090.6049420.55743310
20081.6456751.5069920.549550.9014090.60421210
20092.1006912.1187920.8028721.8194070.87559910
20102.6446992.9622871.1599612.8041651.21646210
20113.268593.7996231.4977473.4747661.49680110
20123.5319044.2403721.6664113.4425011.54760410
20133.6662084.3607181.6441063.0244751.46412510
20143.5638634.2137711.5073182.4376381.3178110
20153.4481643.7153531.2424141.7926861.08334810
Table 8 Unemployment by Sector as a Percentage of the Total Labour Force, 2006-2015 (3 year average)

Figure 26 shows the percentage of people unemployed who classified their previous sector of employment. The not stated/not applicable category in this figure includes persons who have never worked previously and those who have worked previously but not during the past eight years. Unemployment reduced significantly in 2015, most notably in the Construction sector.

Indicator 11: Change in Total Financial Sector Liabilities

Total Financial Sector Liabilities (y-o-y % change)MIP Threshold
200621.588434939573116.5
20079.6163140064250216.5
20086.5198080766800516.5
20093.3734419297238316.5
20106.2939153279431416.5
2011-2.2467557558500316.5
2012-1.8401050513261616.5
2013-2.6608230168034116.5
201423.116011412655316.5
20159.5261882895210516.5

Source publication: Institutional Sector Accounts Non-Financial and Financial 

Get the data: StatBank IFI03

This indicator measures the year-on-year change in the sum of all liabilities of the Financial sector. The indicator breached the MIP threshold of 16.5% in 2006 and 2014 (Figure 27). The growth in Financial sector liabilities in 2006 was mainly related to bank lending to fund investment in both residential and commercial property by the private sector. Since 2007 the indicator has fallen below the threshold, corresponding with a period of deleveraging in the banking sector. The sharp increase in Financial sector liabilities in 2014 was driven mainly by growth in the Investment Funds sector (S.124).

It should be noted that the positive year-on-year growth in total Financial sector liabilities from 2006-2010 has also been heavily influenced by the expansion of the Investment Funds sector in Ireland. Despite a contraction in this indicator in the period 2011 to 2013, the Investment Funds sector has continued to expand during these years, as can be seen in Figure 28.

Supplementary analysis: 

Central BankBanks and Money Market FundsInvestment FundsOther Financial CorporationsTotal Financial Sector
20067.397161305.51682.9077364231115.078133381995510.899030805096
200713.246039189.98924.888974731959948.5795956007066276.703609332667
200862.61158.8309999999999-125.05180052568209.253872068786205.644071543106
20098.187-117.362109.4768964113.038570186166113.340466586166
201079.122-127.316186.21299280.5767159091542218.595707909154
2011-28.15-266.049788753134173.07434538.181438723019-82.9440050301154
2012-38.537-149.020185593866199.627479115882-78.4756230444618-66.4053295224455
2013-32.837-92.8608256530001162.462267025444-131.020742354127-94.2563009816829
2014-23.167763211042275.7750680872714453.568690549474290.891270184261797.067265609964
2015-3.04341143301284-44.7645979925524165.44822688065286.764089242907404.404306697992
Table 9 Breakdown of Change in Financial Sector Liabilities, 2006-2015 (€ billion)

Aside from a contraction in 2008, as a result of the financial crisis, the Investment Funds sector has shown continuous growth in balance sheet size since 2009. Figure 28 shows the effect of this growth on the Financial sector in helping to offset the deleveraging which occurred in the banking sector from 2009 to 2013. For the first time since 2008 the banking sector showed year-on-year growth in its balance sheet during 2014, which returned to a contraction in 2015.

It should be noted that part of the large increase in liabilities of the Other Financial Corporations subsector shown in 2014 and 2015 is a result of a newly available data source for this period. Another driver of this change is the growth in balance sheet size of treasury companies. More detail is provided in the CSO’s note on Measuring Shadow Banking in the Irish National Accounts (PDF 2,503KB) .

Indicator 12: Activity Rate

Activity Rate (3 year % change)MIP Threshold
20063.1-0.2
20073.1-0.2
20081.3-0.2
2009-1.3-0.2
2010-3.2-0.2
2011-2.9-0.2
2012-1.4-0.2
20130.4-0.2
20140.6-0.2
20150.8-0.2

Source publication: Quarterly National Household Survey

Get the Data: StatBank QNQ23 (ILO participation rates), Eurostat database

The activity rate is the percentage of the population aged 15-64 years in the labour force as a proportion of the total population of the same age. The particular indicator is measured as a 3 year percentage change. It has a threshold of -0.2%.

IrelandGermanyGreeceNetherlandsSpainUnited KingdomMIP Threshold
20063.12.81.70.93.10.4-0.2
20073.130.31.92.90.2-0.2
20081.32.10.32.42.70.4-0.2
2009-1.31.40.72.320-0.2
2010-3.21.11.3-0.31.7-0.1-0.2
2011-2.91.40.6-1.21.2-0.3-0.2
2012-1.40.90.1-0.71.20.4-0.2
20130.40.9-0.31.20.81-0.2
20140.60.40.10.90.31.2-0.2
20150.80.40.30.600.8-0.2

Ireland’s activity rate grew as a three year percentage change from 2006 to 2008, as did many comparable European countries. However, from 2009 to 2012 onwards it declined more sharply than all other countries.

15-24 years25-34 years35-44 years45-54 years55-64 yearsTotal
200624.8593.47546.8546.22536.975248.375
200740.475103.17553.74438.25279.6
200816.07573.2549.739.12532.125210.275
2009-43.07526.22538.1531.121.52573.925
2010-106.725-17.520.67522.72516.8-64.0250000000001
2011-114.1-37.92517.215.312.7-106.825
2012-87.275-46.42523.37517.77513.675-78.8749999999999
2013-53.325-55.17532.22522.8523.225-30.1999999999999
2014-43.8-64.12533.72526.4526.55-21.2000000000002
2015-36.15-69.6529.52534.8538-3.42500000000007

The increases in the activity rate from 2005 to 2008 related in large part to people aged 25 to 34 years of age joining the labour force. The decline in the activity rate from 2010 onwards was due to people aged 15 to 24 leaving the labour force.

Table 10 Breakdown in Activity Rate, 2006-2015 (change in thousands over 3 years)

IrelandGermanyGreeceNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
200671.974.966.777.475.7
200772.675.666.578.575.5
200872.175.966.779.375.8
200970.676.367.479.775.7
201069.476.767.878.275.4
201169.277.367.378.175.5
201269.277.267.57976.1
201369.877.667.579.476.4
201469.877.767.47976.7
20157077.667.879.676.9

Get the data: Eurostat database

Compared to the overall EU rate and three of the country’s largest European trading partners, Ireland has consistently had a relatively low activity rate.

Indicator 13: Change in the Long-term Unemployment Rate

Long-term Unemployment (3 year % change)MIP Threshold
2006-0.09920226717012330.5
2007-0.1612765248281220.5
20080.2473632855552090.5
20092.061855746131860.5
20105.364948034636420.5
20116.90454065831220.5
20125.507496001270060.5
20131.062850834205360.5
2014-2.022019702944520.5
2015-3.69290315849070.5

Source publication: Quarterly National Household Survey 

Get the data: StatBank QNQ39 (duration of unemployment), Eurostat database

The long-term unemployment rate expresses the number of people aged 15 to 74 unemployed for over one year as a percentage of the active population of the same age. The MIP threshold is a 0.5% increase compared to three years previously. After falls in the long-term unemployment rate (measured as a three year percentage change) from 2006 to 2007, Ireland’s long-term unemployment rate increased from 2009 to 2013 at rates far above the 0.5% threshold. Long-term unemployment as a three year percentage change has declined in 2015.

Supplementary analysis:

15 - 24 years25 - 44 years45 years and overTotal
20060.70.3249999999999990.651.675
20070.02500000000000010.850.02500000000000040.875
20082.653.92.28.8
200912.1524.07510.72546.95
201023.3563.22529.7116.3
201123.0586.62538.05147.725
201213.47565.3537.275116.15
2013-7.32512.12516.721.525
2014-13.975-31.551.2-44.4
2015-17.825-47.35-13.7-78.9
Table 11 Long Term Unemployment in thousands, 2006-2015 (change over 3 years)

Separating out the figures, it is clear that the bulk of those who became long-term unemployed from 2009 to 2012, measured as a three year change in absolute values, were aged between 25 and 44 years of age. The decline in the numbers unemployed in 2015 were also mostly made up of people in this category.

Long-term unemployment rate, 2015
Greece18.2
Spain11.4
Croatia10.3
Slovakia7.6
Portugal7.2
Italy6.9
Cyprus6.8
Bulgaria5.6
Ireland5.3
Slovenia4.7
Latvia4.5
Belgium4.4
France4.3
Lithuania3.9
Hungary3.1
Netherlands3
Poland3
Romania3
Czech Republic2.4
Estonia2.4
Malta2.4
Finland2.3
Germany2
Luxembourg1.9
Denmark1.7
Austria1.7
United Kingdom1.6
Sweden1.5

Get the data: Eurostat database

IrelandGermanyGreeceNetherlandsSpainUnited Kingdom
20061.45.74.91.71.81.2
20071.44.94.21.21.71.3
20081.73.93.70.921.4
20093.53.53.90.84.31.9
20106.83.35.71.27.32.5
20118.62.88.81.68.92.7
201292.414.51.9112.7
20137.82.318.52.5132.7
20146.62.219.52.912.92.2
20155.3218.2311.41.6

Ireland’s long-term employment rate is higher than three of its major trading partners, the Netherlands, Germany, and the United Kingdom.

Indicator 14: Change in Youth Unemployment

Youth Unemployment Rate (3 year % change)MIP Threshold
2006-0.03568159941468422
20070.2975730968385232
20084.655372228928832
200915.36304245405562
201018.57803263464372
201115.76361395668022
20126.321346403001862
2013-0.8565028148528222
2014-5.120568897861272
2015-9.460888194613032

Source publication: Quarterly National Household Survey

Get the data: StatBank QNQ24 (ILO Participation, Employment and Unemployment Characteristics by Age Group)

The MIP threshold is a 2% change over three years. Ireland’s youth unemployment increased from 2008 to 2012, peaking with an 18% increase in 2010. Substantial reduction in youth unemployment can be seen in 2014 and 2015.

Supplementary analysis:

15-19 years20-24 years
20060.4750000000000011.52500000000001
20071.23.45000000000002
20084.27513.425
20098.335.775
20106.533.15
20113.6519.025
2012-1.275-5.34999999999998
2013-2.425-14
2014-4.375-18.425
2015-6.525-22.4

Get the data: StatBank QNQ24

Breaking down the change in youth unemployment by age, most of the increase and reduction in youth unemployment is driven by those aged from 20 to 24.

Youth Unemployment Rate, 2015
Greece49.8
Spain48.3
Croatia43
Italy40.3
Cyprus32.8
Portugal32
Slovakia26.5
France24.7
Finland22.4
Belgium22.1
Romania21.7
Bulgaria21.6
Ireland20.9
Poland20.8
Sweden20.4
Hungary17.3
Luxembourg16.6
Latvia16.3
Lithuania16.3
Slovenia16.3
United Kingdom14.6
Estonia13.1
Czech Republic12.6
Malta11.8
Netherlands11.3
Denmark10.8
Austria10.6
Germany7.2

Get the data: Eurostat database

Ireland’s youth unemployment rate compared to its EU neighbours in 2015 is shown in the chart above.

IrelandGermanyGreeceNetherlandsSpain
20068.713.6251017.9
20079.111.822.79.418.1
200813.310.421.98.624.5
20092411.125.710.237.7
201027.69.83311.141.5
201129.18.544.71046.2
201230.4855.311.752.9
201326.87.858.313.255.5
201423.97.752.412.753.2
201520.97.249.811.348.3

Get the data: Eurostat database

Compared to the Netherlands and Germany, Ireland’s youth unemployment rate has been relatively high since 2009.

Footnotes:

1 The reference to the CSO's note on Measuring Shadow Banking in Irish National Accounts was added post-publication (May 2017). 

Go to Auxiliary Indicators >>

Go to top >>

Why you can Trust the CSO

Learn about our data and confidentiality safeguards, and the steps we take to produce statistics that can be trusted by all.