Back to Top

Pulse Survey now running Five years on, we're measuring the lasting impact of COVID-19 on our lives in our latest short Pulse Survey. CSO Pulse Surveys are anonymous and open to all. #CSOTakePart

 Skip navigation

Ultimate Investment

Open in Excel:

In this chapter, Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Ireland is analysed by geography and sector on both the immediate and ultimate investment basis. The immediate investor with respect to FDI, refers to the foreign firm that is investing directly into the domestic firm. The ultimate investor or ultimate controlling parent (UCP) is the firm that has the final controlling power over the immediate investor. The purpose of analysing FDI on an immediate investment basis is to see where investment is coming from or going to, this reflects the OECD Benchmark Definition of FDI. The purpose of analysing FDI on an ultimate investment basis is to see where an investment comes from originally and where the profits from investment ultimately accrue.

Inward FDI Positions
United States289.28213572
Luxembourg165.49366321
Bermuda66.830504055
United Kingdom53.191498485
France21.019802237
Germany6.261813365
Netherlands-14.4183317

Source publication: Foreign Direct Investment Annual 2018

Get the data: StatBank BPA34

In Figure 2.1, the United States, Luxembourg and Bermuda are shown to be Ireland’s top three partner countries for inward FDI investments, with investment from the United States at just under €300bn.

Inward FDI Positions
United States649.43707059
Ireland91.515
Bermuda31.549942107
United Kingdom17.957485667
France13.142609012
Germany13.126397677
Netherlands4.706870133
Canada4.680408679

In Figure 2.2 however, when we analyse inward FDI positions on an ultimate investment basis, investment from the United States is more than double the level displayed on the immediate investment basis in Figure 2.1. This means that a significant portion of investment had an origin in the United States but entered Ireland from a different country. It is important to note the differences when viewing investment using the two distinct presentations: immediate partner country investment and ultimate controlling parent investment (UCP). Notably, significant portions of investment from Luxembourg and Bermuda are evident when viewed by immediate investor, but they are much smaller when analysed by the geography of the ultimate controlling parent (UCP). Investment from Ireland as ultimate investor, at €92bn, is due to the presence of redomiciled PLCs which are located in Ireland.

Inward FDI from Ultimate Investors in the US (left axis)As a % of Total Inward FDI (right axis)
2013172.3040402957.2947321348303
2014197.9805625255.9195376399144
2015560.0380571868.4994490562763
2016522.8826114165.56351050142
2017653.3239633474.0586689118506
2018649.4370705974.3282337971865

Figure 2.3 describes investment from the United States on an ultimate investment basis. The share of US foreign direct investment in Ireland has risen steadily over the period shown, while their FDI positions have grown significantly following a large increase in 2015 relating to the financing of intellectual property in Ireland.

Outward FDI Positions
Luxembourg330.64733521
United States92.895670723
United Kingdom85.875892818
Netherlands69.397059542
Bermuda48.420567735
France3.750981262
Germany3.511502349

Source publication: Foreign Direct Investment Annual 2018

Get the data: StatBank BPA34

Figure 2.4 shows that Luxembourg receives the largest amount of FDI from Ireland on an immediate partner country basis.

Outward FDI Positions
Ireland529.10313816
United States243.89049382
Other50.50738861

Figure 2.5 shows outward FDI positions on an ultimate controlling parent basis. Outward FDI on an ultimate basis is dominated by the Redomiciled PLCs which are firms that have headquartered in Ireland but have substantial investments abroad and a significant portion of their operations abroad. Outward FDI is shown for the Redomiciled PLCS (under Ireland), the United States, and all other countries are under the 'Other' category.  

FDI Income Inflows
Luxembourg9.451
Netherlands6.973
United Kingdom2.542
Bermuda0.911
Belgium0.072
France0.066
Italy0.049
Germany-0.095
United States-1.351

Source publication: Foreign Direct Investment Annual 2018

Get the data: StatBank BPA37

Figure 2.6 shows FDI income inflows on an immediate basis, which is profit earned on Irish investment abroad. Investments in Luxembourg, Netherlands and the United Kingdom return the largest amount of FDI profits on an immediate partner country basis.

IrelandUnited StatesOther
201311.2024.7642.801
20149.4293.4612.783
201513.011-0.4873.081
201615.6420.5152.326
201716.3851.9742.461
201816.0920.3331.289

Figure 2.7 shows Irish FDI income inflows on an ultimate basis. Profits coming into Ireland on FDI are dominated by the redomiciled PLCs; they account for the majority of the FDI profit inflows.

FDI Income Outflows
Luxembourg12.449096805
Switzerland11.514711934
United States9.914974285
Netherlands7.940957083
Bermuda6.972537267
United Kingdom3.986904092
Belgium3.04476495
France2.381031916
Italy1.412216985
Germany0.816523535
Japan0.493915552
Spain0.463324299

Source publication: Foreign Direct Investment Annual 2018

Get the data: StatBank BPA34

For FDI income outflows, shown in Figure 2.8, Luxembourg, Switzerland, and the United States receive the largest amounts of profits on Irish investments on an immediate partner country basis.

FDI Income Outflow
United States66.729
France1.629
Germany1.506
Japan1.355
Other5.77600000000001

Figure 2.9 shows FDI profit outflows on an ultimate controlling parent basis. This graph illustrates the significant amounts of profits accruing to the United States on their investments in Ireland. In 2018, investors in the United States accrued €66.7bn in FDI income from investments in Ireland. The differences between Figure 2.8 and 2.9 show that while these investments accrue to the United States they pass through affiliates and subsidiaries in other highly globalised countries on their way back to the United States.

FDI Income Outflows to US (left axis)As a % of Total FDI Income Outflows (right axis)
201332.60176.5479349127709
201426.2276.6330556773345
201558.02883.4526993988552
201650.01580.5913631969062
201760.82983.7518931570976
201866.72986.6666666666667

Figure 2.10 shows FDI income outflows to the United States over time and as a proportion of total FDI income outflows on an ultimate controlling parent basis. This graph shows a big increase in 2015 for the total amount of income accruing to the United States from investments in Ireland.

Top 2526-5051-7576-100101+
FDI Income63.53198777610.5460925424.80263004210.546092542-4.692350501

Figure 2.11 describes the distribution of FDI income outflows from Ireland. Firms are sorted on their FDI income outflows and then grouped. The graph shows that most of the profits made on FDI in Ireland are accruing to a small number of large firms; this can be seen by the high concentration of FDI income at the top of the distribution i.e. €64bn in income outflows accruing to the top 25 firms in the distribution.

ManufacturingInformation and CommunicationAdministrative and Support ServicesFinancial and Insurance ActivitiesScientific and Technical Activities
201319.7146.7482.8839.6651.008
201413.686.4793.2267.391.373
201542.3918.6194.79510.1382.055
201635.1168.7114.60310.681.948
201738.2511.1357.07510.8882.421
201842.17511.4988.6058.1183.083

Figure 2.12 shows a time series of FDI income outflows by sector. The graph illustrates that the manufacturing sector receives the highest amount of income on its FDI investments in Ireland.

The Profitability of FDI

The profitability of FDI is measured, as with conventional investment, as the rate of return on the investment. The definition used in this section for the return on FDI is:

Return = FDI Income / FDI Positions

where the equity income return is expressed as a percentage of the total FDI position.1

This measure, when examined across geography and industrial sectors, can give an indication of which investors are making the most profitable foreign direct investments. It should be noted, however, that many factors (structural, cyclical, firm specific) should be considered when drawing inference from these results.

Where country breakdowns are provided, this analysis provides the return data for countries from which the largest amounts of investment into Ireland arrive.

Return on Inward FDIReturn on Outward FDI
201314.16174189986134.83987459963879
20149.664014264816493.07491129917088
20158.504851821432991.86767654643599
20167.781615553720642.27444219507224
20178.233099388501162.53028572286456
20188.812096845680892.15105987207019

Source publication: Foreign Direct Investment Annual 2018

Get the data: StatBank BPA34StatBank BPA37

Figure 2.13 illustrates the rate of return on FDI investment in Ireland is higher than the Irish rate of return on FDI investments abroad.

United StatesLuxembourgSwitzerlandBermudaUnited KingdomFranceBelgiumNetherlands
201315.981674544.9023596743.4800150755.324003423.756341418.6871602534.4877790618.44398441
201418.958824084.9426614928.1422729624.260288734.36833159.6572640917.319744447.3775156
20150.745309933.7626871648.9787847721.717381468.1359082811.6551484214.7511393713.70738992
20161.20548216.1008941412.7357963226.695383825.5373920610.6341110213.5573918214.58742526
20174.930234324.9198541311.2794127531.338618377.4368825310.9908286529.476154858.72877962
20183.427440927.522400916.6112457310.433165767.4953784111.3275657416.45235918-55.0754224

Source publication: Foreign Direct Investment Annual 2018

Get the data: StatBank BPA34StatBank BPA37

Figure 2.14 shows the FDI rate of return by immediate partner country of investment. The most notable trend here being the significant decrease that occurred in the FDI rate of return in Ireland from the Netherlands in 2018. This decrease in the rate of return for the Netherlands was caused by a €106bn decrease that occurred in their FDI positions in Ireland on an immediate partner country basis; however, on an ultimate basis, there is no simultaneous large decrease. As seen in Figure 2.2, FDI positions from the Netherlands on an ultimate basis have remained relatively unchanged at €4.7 billion. The increase in 2015 for the rate of return on FDI from Switzerland was due to income increasing from €3bn to €6bn (100% increase) while positions only increased from €10bn to €12bn (20%).

Immediate InvestmentUltimate Controlling Parent
201315.9816745418.9206242321017
201418.9588240813.2437243668056
20150.7453099310.3614387015398
20161.20548219.56524445613712
20174.930234329.31069475685888
20183.4274409210.274898527024

As shown in Figure 2.9, most of FDI income outflows are accrued by investors in the United States. Figure 2.15 illustrates the return on investment from the United States. The large decrease that occurs in 2015 for returns on income on an immediate partner country basis stems from the big increase in the denominator of that figure which is the United States FDI positions, which experienced a large increase that year.


Footnotes

1This differs from the definition prescribed in BD4 by including FDI income on debt. 


Next Chapter >> FDI Associated Employment