Back to Top

 Skip navigation

Extra information
Methodology Previous Releases
International comparison:
For more information on this release:
E-mail: business_stats@cso.ie Colin Hanley (+353) 21 453 5559 Eamonn Cleary (+353) 21 453 5483
For general information on CSO statistics:
information@cso.ie (+353) 21 453 5000 On-line ISSN
CSO statistical release, , 11am

Business Impact of COVID-19 Survey

2020

Current trading status as at 19 April 2020
 % of responding enterprises
 Continuing to tradeCeased trading temporarily or permanently
 
Industry82.317.7
Construction29.270.8
Distribution79.420.6
Services79.720.3
Total76.023.9

76.0% of responding enterprises continuing to trade

FIG 1: Trading status 19 Apr 2020
go to full release

The Business Impact of COVID-19 Survey (BICS) has been created to measure and report quickly on the impact of COVID-19 on business in Ireland. The first wave of the survey was collected in the week commencing 19 April 2020.

A total of 3,000 enterprises were surveyed online for BICS Wave One, with 26% of sampled enterprises completing the survey.

It is important to note that the results presented in the BICS represent responding enterprises only. The CSO acknowledges that non-response may be related to whether businesses are adversely impacted by COVID-19. If this were the case, there is potential for bias in these estimates that weighting procedures would not correct for. As such, the results presented here are unweighted.

Further waves of this survey are being collected fortnightly to provide updated information on the business impact of COVID-19. 

Please note that all businesses may not be in a position to respond to the Business Impact of COVID-19 Survey. Therefore, the results may only reflect the characteristics of those who responded.

23.9% of responding enterprises have temporarily or permanently ceased trading

  • Over three-quarters (76.0%) of enterprises which responded to the Business Impact of COVID-19 Survey were continuing to trade on 19 April 2020.
  • Amongst responding enterprises, 23.9% had ceased trading either temporarily or permanently. However, the vast majority of this cohort indicated in their response that this is intended to be a temporary closure. See Figure 1 and Headline Table.
For long labels below use
to display on multiple lines
Continuing to tradeCeased trading temporarily or permanently
Industry82.317.7
Construction29.270.8
Distribution79.420.6
Services79.720.3
Total7624

Seven of every ten responding enterprises in the Construction sector have ceased trading either temporarily or permanently

  • Seven of every ten (70.8%) responding enterprises in the Construction sector have ceased trading either temporarily or permanently during the period 16 March to 19 April 2020.
  • Responding enterprises in the Industrial sector reported the greatest percentage of enterprises continuing to trade at 82.3% during the period 16 March to 19 April 2020.
  • One in five (20.3%) responding enterprises in the Services sector has ceased trading either temporarily or permanently during the period 16 March to 19 April 2020. For responding enterprises in the Accommodation and Food Service activities sector, this rises to 88.1%. See Figure 2 and Headline Table.
For long labels below use
to display on multiple lines
Turnover
Significantly lower than normal54.2
Slightly lower than normal16.2
Within normal expectations1.4
Slightly higher than normal2.7
Significantly higher than normal3.2
Not impacted18.2
Don't know4.1

Over 54% of responding enterprises indicated that their turnover over the five-week period was significantly lower than normal due to COVID-19

  • Over half of responding enterprises (54.2%), indicated that their turnover over the five-week period from 16 March 2020 to 19 April 2020 was significantly lower than normal due to COVID-19, while 16.2% of responding enterprises reported that their turnover was slightly lower than normal. In total 70.4% of companies responded that their turnover was lower than normal.
  • Approximately one in five (19.6%) responding enterprises indicated that their turnover was either not impacted or was within normal expectations during the five-week period 16 March to 19 April.
  • Over one in five (21.0%) of responding enterprises in the Wholesale and Retail Trade sector reported higher than normal turnover for the period 16 March to 19 April. This figure was 31.6% for responding enterprises in Retail Trade only.
  • Across all sectors, 5.9% of companies reported that turnover was above normal for the same period. See Figure 3 and Table 1.
For long labels below use
to display on multiple lines
Q2 2020Q1 2020
75 to 100% less than normal20.912.4
50 to 74% less than normal197.4
25 to 49% less than normal18.915.4
10 to 24% less than normal15.918.8
At or close to normal expectation18.636.2
More than normal6.69.8

More than half of responding enterprises reported that their turnover was below expectations for Quarter 1 2020

  • For quarter 1 2020, 36.2% of enterprises indicated that their turnover was at or close to normal expectations. More than half (54.0%) reported that their turnover was below expectations for quarter 1. One in eight (12.4%) stated that their quarterly turnover was more than 75% below normal.
  • Only one in ten (9.8%) respondents reported that their turnover in quarter 1 was above expectations.
  • Only 18.6% of responding enterprises indicated a best estimate for turnover close to normal expectations for quarter 2 2020 while 6.6% reported they expect above normal turnover for quarter 2.
  • For quarter 2, almost three-quarters (74.7%) of responding enterprises indicated that their expected turnover will decrease by at least 10% when compared to normal. See Figure 4 and Table 2.
For long labels below use
to display on multiple lines
ImportsExports
Decrease46.954.6
Increase3.72.7
Not affected39.335.3
Don't know107.5

More than 50% of responding enterprises had a decrease in exports

  • Over half (54.6%) of responding enterprises indicated that their exports decreased as a result of COVID-19 over the five-week period from 16 March 2020 to 19 April 2020, while 46.9% of responding enterprises reported a decrease in imports over the period.
  • Approximately two in five responding enterprises (39.3%) indicated that their imports were not affected by COVID-19 during the five-week reference period, while 35.3% stated that their exports were not affected. See Figure 5 and Table 3.
For long labels below use
to display on multiple lines
Workforce changes
Implemented remote working69
Decreased working hours32
Increased working hours4.6
Staff placed on paid leave15.8
Staff let go temporarily34.6
Staff let go permanently4.8
Staff hired temporarily5.4
Staff hired permanently1.5
Other16.8

Over two-thirds of responding enterprises indicated that they implemented remote working

  • Over two-thirds (69.0%) of responding enterprises indicated that they implemented remote working over the five-week period from 16 March to 19 April 2020.
  • 92.1% of Large enterprises stated that they implemented remote working, compared to 45.7% of Micro enterprises.
  • All responding enterprises in the Professional, Scientific and Technical activities implemented some form of remote working.
  • Nine in ten (90.6%) responding enterprises in Computer Programming, Consultancy and Related activities implemented remote working.
  • 84.4% of Wholesale Trade enterprises implemented remote working compared with 29.9% of enterprises in Retail Trade.
  • Approximately one-third (34.6%) of responding enterprises indicated that they have temporarily let staff go over the five-week reference period, while almost one-third (32.0%) reported decreased working hours.
  • 53.2% of responding enterprises in Administrative and Support Services had reduced working hours.
  • The most prominent responses within the 'Other' category related to implementing social distancing measures in the workplace and reducing payroll costs.
  • 5.4% of responding enterprises hired staff on a temporary basis during the five-week reference period, while 1.5% of responding enterprises hired staff permanently. See Figure 6 and Table 4.
For long labels below use
to display on multiple lines
Half or more working remotelyHalf or more working at normal locations
SME (<250)27.721.4
Large (250+)35.330.9
Total2923.1

Almost three in every ten responding businesses had the majority of their workforce working remotely during the period 16 March to 19 April

  • Almost three in every ten (29.0%) responding businesses had the majority of their workforce working remotely during the period 16 March to 19 April.
  • A higher percentage of Large responding enterprises had the majority of their workforce deployed remotely with 35.3% compared to 27.7% of SMEs.
  • Almost a quarter (23.1%) of responding enterprises had most of their staff deployed at their normal working location. See Figure 7 and Table 5.
For long labels below use
to display on multiple lines
Don't knowHigh impactModerate impactLow impactNo impact
Reduced domestic demand4.746.819.210.418.8
Reduced international demand13.720.712.510.542.6
Cashflow difficulties431.124.320.919.7
Liquidity issues9.416.920.921.131.7
Lower productivity5.932.620.318.722.5
Logistics issues8.120.924.82620.3
Supply chain interruptions8.120.62426.920.4
Restrictions on business operations3.141.32421.110.5

46.8% of responding enterprises reported that reduced domestic demand had a high impact on their business

  • Reduced domestic demand had a high impact on 46.8% of responding enterprises during the five-week reference period from 16 March to 19 April 2020.
  • Two in five responding enterprises (41.3%) indicated that restrictions on business operations were of high impact during the five-week reference period.
  • Reduced international demand as a result of COVID-19 had no impact on 42.6% of responding enterprises during the period 16 March to 19 April 2020.
  • Cashflow difficulties had a high impact for 31.1% of responding enterprises. This was 83.3% for responding enterprises in Accommodation and Food Service.
  • 83.9% of responding enterprises in the Construction sector have been highly impacted by restrictions on business operations while 72.6% have felt a high impact from lower productivity.
  • Almost one-third (32.6%) of responding enterprises indicated that lower productivity had a high level of impact on their business during the five-week period. See Figure 8 and Table 6.
For long labels below use
to display on multiple lines
SMEs (<250)Large (250+)Total
Decrease in access to finance10.97.910.4
Increase in access to finance7.55.87.2
No change in access to finance63.173.465
Don't know18.512.917.5

No change in ability to access finance according to almost two-thirds of responding enterprises

  • Almost two-thirds (65.0%) of responding enterprises indicated that there was no change in their ability to access finance between 16 March and 19 April 2020.
  • A decrease in access to finance was indicated by 10.9% of responding SMEs and 7.9% of large companies who responded to the survey. See Figure 9 and Table 7.
For long labels below use
to display on multiple lines
Don't knowNot confidentConfident
Total20.85.973.3
Large (250+)13.82.284.1
SMEs (<250)22.36.771

Nearly three-quarters of enterprises are confident they have the financial resources to continue operating during the COVID-19 crisis

  • Amongst responding enterprises as of week ending 19 April 2020, a greater proportion of large enterprises (84.1%) were confident that they had the financial resources to continue operating than was the case for responding SMEs (71.0%).
  • In total, 5.9% of responding enterprises indicated that, as of the week ending 19 April 2020, they were not confident that they had the financial resources to continue operating.
  • Over one in five responding enterprises (20.8%) indicated that they did not know, as of the week ending 19 April 2020, if its business had the financial resources to continue operating throughout the COVID-19 crisis. See Figure 10 and Table 8.

Nearly half of responding enterprises availed of Government supports schemes

  • In total, 46.9% of responding enterprises had availed of the Revenue Temporary COVID-19 Wage Subsidy Scheme during the five-week period from 16 March to 19 April 2020, while 5.5% had availed of a scheme other than this.
  • Slightly over half of responding enterprises (51.6%) indicated that they had not availed of any state scheme related to COVID-19 during the five-week reference period. See Figure 11 and Table 9.
Availed of Government support
Yes48.4
No51.6
Table 1 COVID-19 impact on turnover versus normal expectations, 16 March to 19 April 2020
Impact on turnover% of responding enterprises
Significantly lower than normal54.2
Slightly lower than normal16.2
Within normal expectations1.4
Slightly higher than normal2.7
Significantly higher than normal3.2
Not Impacted18.2
Don't know4.1
Table 2 Estimated impact on turnover, quarters 1 and 2 2020
 % of responding enterprises
 Quarter 1Quarter 2
 20202020
75-100% less than normal12.420.9
50-74% less than normal7.419.0
25-49% less than normal15.418.9
10-24% less than normal18.815.9
At or close to normal expectation36.218.6
More than normal9.86.6
Table 3 COVID-19 impact on international trade, 16 March to 19 April 2020
 % of responding enterprises
 ExportsImports
Decrease54.646.9
Increase2.73.7
Not affected35.339.3
Don't know7.510.0
Table 4 Workforce changes implemented, 16 March to 19 April 2020
 % of responding enterprises
Implemented remote working69.0
Decreased working hours32.0
Increased working hours4.6
Staff placed on paid leave15.8
Staff let go temporarily34.6
Staff let go permanently4.8
Staff hired temporarily5.4
Staff hired permanently1.5
Other16.8
Table 5 Workforce location by size class, 16 March to 19 April 2020
 % of responding enterprises
 SMEsLargeTotal
 (<250)(250+) 
Less than half of workforce working remotely72.364.771.0
Half, or more, of workforce working remotely27.735.329.0
Less than half of workforce at normal location78.669.176.9
Half, or more, of workforce at normal location21.430.923.1
Table 6 COVID-19 impact on enterprises by level of impact, 16 March to 19 April 2020
  % of responding enterprises
 No impactLow impactModerate impactHigh impactDon't know
Reduced domestic demand18.810.419.246.84.7
Reduced international demand42.610.512.520.713.7
Cashflow difficulties19.720.924.331.14.0
Liquidity issues31.721.120.916.99.4
Lower productivity22.518.720.332.65.9
Logistics issues20.326.024.820.98.1
Supply chain interruptions20.426.924.020.68.1
Restrictions on business operations10.521.124.041.33.1
Table 7 Change in access to finance by size class, 16 March to 19 April 2020
 % of responding enterprises
 SMEsLargeTotal
 (<250)(250+) 
Decrease in access to finance10.97.910.4
Increase in access to finance7.55.87.2
No change in access to finance63.173.465.0
Don't know18.512.917.5
Table 8 Confidence in financial resources to continue operating throughout the COVID-19 crisis by size class, 19 April 2020
 % of responding enterprises
 SMEsLargeTotal
 (<250)(250+) 
Confident71.084.173.3
Not confident6.72.25.9
Don't know22.313.820.8
Table 9 Availing of Government supports by size class, 16 March to 19 April 2020
 % of responding enterprises
 SMEsLargeTotal
 (<250)(250+) 
Revenue Temporary COVID-19 Wage Subsidy Scheme47.146.046.9
Other5.45.85.5
Not availed of Government support51.551.851.6

Background Notes

Introduction

The Business Impact of COVID-19 Survey (BICS) has been created to measure and report quickly on key features of the impact of the COVID-19 crisis on business in Ireland.

The survey is being conducted online and covers a sample of 3,000 enterprises. The first wave of the survey was collected in the week commencing 19 April 2020 and updated waves will be collected on a fortnightly basis between April and July 2020.

Statistical Confidentiality

The survey was collected from enterprises on a voluntary basis under Section 24 of the Statistics Act, 1993.

The information collected in the survey is confidential under the Statistics Act and will only be used by the Central Statistics Office for the compilation of aggregate statistics. The CSO has checked the statistical outputs of the survey to ensure that tables do not disclose details of any company. The raw data will not be shared with any other organisations.

The CSO would like to thank businesses that responded to the Business Impact of COVID-19 Survey.

Sample

The reporting statistical unit for the BICS is the enterprise. The sample size for the BICS is 3,000 enterprises. The enterprise is defined as the smallest combination of legal units that is an organisational unit producing goods and/or services, which benefits from a certain degree of autonomy in decision-making.

The response rate to the first survey was 26%. It is important to note that the results of the survey apply to respondents only, and that no imputation or estimation procedures have been used in the case of non-response. The CSO acknowledges that not all businesses may be in a position to respond to the survey. Therefore, as the results of the survey are unweighted, they may only reflect the characteristics of those who have responded.

Enterprises of all size classes were surveyed. The sectors of economic activity included in the survey were determined in accordance with the NACE Rev. 2 classification scheme, which is the European Commission’s classification system for economic activity. The NACE Rev. 2 sectors included in the survey were as follows:

Sector B:          Mining and quarrying

Sector C:          Manufacturing

Sector D:          Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply

Sector E:          Water supply; sewerage, waste management and remediation activities

Sector F:          Construction

Sector G:          Wholesale and retail trade; Repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles

Sector H:          Transportation and storage

Sector I:            Accommodation and food service activities

Sector J:           Information and communication

Sector K:           Financial and insurance activities

Sector L:           Real estate activities   

Sector M:          Professional, scientific and technical activities

Sector N:          Administrative and support service activities

Sector R:          Arts, entertainment and recreation

Sector S:          Other service activities

Please note that some more granular NACE Rev. 2 descriptions were also referenced in the text of this release. For further information on the NACE Rev. 2 classification scheme, please click here.

Data Collection and Questionnaire

The survey is collected via an online questionnaire. The topics covered are about how the COVID-19 crisis has affected the business and what steps it has taken as a result – e.g. in relation to the level of business, workforce and organisational changes, access to finance, and availing of Government support schemes.

The following is a link to the questionnaire for each wave of the BICS survey: click here.

Output Classifications - Definitions

Size Class

For the BICS, the size class of an enterprise is determined by the number of persons engaged associated with the enterprise as follows:

Size Class  Number of Persons Engaged
Micro  0 - 9
Small  10 - 49
Medium  50 - 249
SMEs  0 - 249
Large  250+

A Small or Medium Enterprise (SME) is essentially an amalgamation of the Micro, Small and Medium categories, i.e. having 0-249 persons engaged.

Sector

In the above results, there are cases where several NACE Rev. 2 categories are presented in aggregate form as follows:

Sector    NACE Rev. 2 Category
Industry  B-E
Construction    F
Distribution  G
Services  H-N, R-S


Other Breakdowns
 

Many of the breakdowns in this release are based on the enterprise’s own best estimate at a point in time. The qualitative nature of these breakdowns has been chosen to limit burden on respondents.

upArrowHide Background Notes